FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4347 vs CD3MCuN

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4347 and CD3MCuN are both stainless steel grades. CD3MCuN is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) for 1.4347, about 15% more; tensile strength follows at 740 MPa (107 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi). CD3MCuN is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 26% for 1.4347. On the shop floor, 1.4347 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than CD3MCuN (high, $$$$).

1.4347Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

CD3MCuNChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1.4347 vs CD3MCuN: properties

1.4347CD3MCuN

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

690 MPa100 ksi
740 MPa107 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
32%

Reduction in Area

40%
45%

Compressive Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Shear Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

290 MPa42.1 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

50 J36.9 ft·lbf
80 J59 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

225 HB
230 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

20 HRC
21 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

235 HV
245 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Hardness, Rockwell B 98 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,380°C2,516 °F

Same in both: Density 7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 16 W/m·K9.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12.8 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.2 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.15 V

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
22%

Weldability

55 / 100
62 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 25 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
47 MJ/kg20,206 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

65%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

89 kN·m/kg
95 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

576 kJ/m³
756 kJ/m³

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
5

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.8 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 4.3 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCD3MCuN1.4347

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4347CD3MCuN
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4347 vs CD3MCuN — frequently asked

Is CD3MCuN stronger than 1.4347?

Yes. CD3MCuN has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) for 1.4347 — about 15% more. Tensile strength is 740 MPa (107 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4347 or CD3MCuN?

1.4347 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while CD3MCuN is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4347 or CD3MCuN?

1.4347. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (30/100) for CD3MCuN; for welding the order is CD3MCuN first (good, 62/100) then 1.4347 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4347 and CD3MCuN side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.