FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 420V vs Nitronic 60

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 420V and Nitronic 60 are both stainless steel grades, both wear resistant ss. 420V is the stronger of the two: yield strength 600 MPa (87 ksi) against 414 MPa (60 ksi) for Nitronic 60, about 45% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 717 MPa (104 ksi). In exchange, Nitronic 60 is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 8% for 420V, and 420V is harder (255 HB vs 210 HB). 420V is lighter (7.39 g/cm³ vs 7.63 g/cm³ for Nitronic 60) and 420V is stiffer (210 GPa vs 196 GPa). On the shop floor, Nitronic 60 machines more easily (28 vs 15 out of 100) and Nitronic 60 welds better (very good vs not recommended).

420VChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Nitronic 60Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

420V vs Nitronic 60: properties

420VNitronic 60

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
196 GPa28.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

900 MPa131 ksi
717 MPa104 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

600 MPa87 ksi
414 MPa60 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
60%

Reduction in Area

15%
65%

Compressive Strength

1,000 MPa145 ksi
—

Shear Strength

550 MPa79.8 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

10 J7.4 ft·lbf
135 J99.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

255 HB
210 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

100 HRB
95 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

25 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

270 HV
220 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.39 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
7.63 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,343°C2,449 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,455°C2,651 °F
1,399°C2,550 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

20 W/m·K11.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12.9 W/m·K7.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
502 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.4 µm/m·K5.8 µin/in·°F
15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
870°C1,598 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.8 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m24.4 µΩ·in
8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

18%
30%

Weldability

12 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

12 / 100
58 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb
53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.5 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
55%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

122 kN·m/kg
94 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

28.4 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

857 kJ/m³
437 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.9 mm²/s
3.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleNitronic 60420V

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability420VNitronic 60
Sheet metal—Yes
Default conditionAnnealedSolution Annealed
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 32 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, CrN, DLC, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing and 20 more.

420V vs Nitronic 60 — frequently asked

Is 420V stronger than Nitronic 60?

Yes. 420V has a typical yield strength of 600 MPa (87 ksi) against 414 MPa (60 ksi) for Nitronic 60 — about 45% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 717 MPa (104 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 420V or Nitronic 60?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 420V or Nitronic 60?

Nitronic 60, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 28/100 against 15/100 for 420V; for welding the order is Nitronic 60 first (very good, 72/100) then 420V (not recommended, 12/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 420V and Nitronic 60 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.