FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 304 vs S33425

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 304 and S33425 are both stainless steel grades. S33425 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 304, about 10% more. In exchange, 304 is the more ductile: elongation 55% versus 45% for S33425. S33425 runs hotter in service (1,150°C vs 870°C continuous) and 304 conducts heat better (16.2 W/m·K vs 12.6 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 304 machines more easily (fair vs poor), 304 welds better (excellent vs good), and 304 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than S33425 (high, $$$$).

304Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

S33425Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

304 vs S33425: properties

304S33425

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

193 GPa28 Msi
196 GPa28.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

77 GPa11.2 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
155 GPa22.5 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

55%
45%

Reduction in Area

70%
55%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
—

Shear Strength

415 MPa60.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

220 MPa·√m200 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

200 J148 ft·lbf
150 J111 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
80 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

160 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 585 MPa84.8 ksi · Hardness, Brinell 150 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.94 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12.6 W/m·K7.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.3 µm/m·K9.6 µin/in·°F
14.4 µm/m·K8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

285 J/g123 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

870°C1,598 °F
1,150°C2,102 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.4 % IACS
1.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in
1.02×10⁻⁶ Ω·m40.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.05 V
-0.15 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
35%

Weldability

88 / 100
68 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

88 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.4 kg CO₂/kg
6.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
74 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.1 MN·m/kg
24.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

162 kJ/m³
193 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.1 mm²/s
3.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale304S33425

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability304S33425
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Casting & forgingYes—
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

304 vs S33425 — frequently asked

Is S33425 stronger than 304?

Yes. S33425 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 304 — about 10% more. Tensile strength is 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 304 or S33425?

304 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while S33425 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 304 or S33425?

304. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (30/100) for S33425; for welding the order is 304 first (excellent, 88/100) then S33425 (good, 68/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 304 and S33425 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.