FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 304 vs 309H

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 304 and 309H are both stainless steel grades. 309H is the stronger of the two: yield strength 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 304, about 24% more; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi). In exchange, 304 is the more ductile: elongation 55% versus 45% for 309H. 309H runs hotter in service (1,095°C vs 870°C continuous). On the shop floor, 304 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100) and 304 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 309H (premium, $$$).

304Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

309HChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

304 vs 309H: properties

304309H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

193 GPa28 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Bulk Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
166 GPa24.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

55%
45%

Reduction in Area

70%
60%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Shear Strength

415 MPa60.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

220 MPa·√m200 ksi·√in
200 MPa·√m182 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

200 J148 ft·lbf
130 J95.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
155 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
83 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

160 HV
165 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.89 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,400°C2,552 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
15.6 W/m·K9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.3 µm/m·K9.6 µin/in·°F
14.9 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

285 J/g123 BTU/lb
275 J/g118 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

870°C1,598 °F
1,095°C2,003 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.4 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in
7.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m30.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.05 V
-0.08 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
40%

Weldability

88 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

88 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.4 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
79 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.1 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

162 kJ/m³
240 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.1 mm²/s
4 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale304309H

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability304309H
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Casting & forgingYes—
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

304 vs 309H — frequently asked

Is 309H stronger than 304?

Yes. 309H has a typical yield strength of 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 304 — about 24% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 304 or 309H?

304 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 309H is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 304 or 309H?

304, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for 309H; for welding the order is 304 first (excellent, 88/100) then 309H (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 304 and 309H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.