FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 13-8 PH vs 420J1

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 13-8 PH and 420J1 are both stainless steel grades, both high strength ss. 13-8 PH is the stronger of the two: yield strength 827 MPa (120 ksi) against 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) for 420J1, about 88% more; tensile strength follows at 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). In exchange, 420J1 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 13% for 13-8 PH, and 13-8 PH is harder (311 HB vs 195 HB). 420J1 runs hotter in service (600°C vs 425°C continuous) and 420J1 conducts heat better (30 W/m·K vs 14 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 420J1 machines more easily (fair vs poor), 13-8 PH welds better (good vs fair), and 420J1 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 13-8 PH (specialty, $$$$$).

13-8 PHChoose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

420J1Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

13-8 PH vs 420J1: properties

13-8 PH420J1

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,000 MPa145 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

827 MPa120 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

13%
22%

Compressive Strength

850 MPa123 ksi
—

Shear Strength

620 MPa89.9 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

55 J40.6 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

311 HB
195 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

33 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

330 HV
205 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
92 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Shear Modulus 78 GPa11.3 Msi · Reduction in Area 55%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.76 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,440°C2,624 °F
1,510°C2,750 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.6 µm/m·K5.9 µin/in·°F
10.5 µm/m·K5.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Min Service Temperature

-73°C-99 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
3.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in
5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
48 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
55%

Weldability

62 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

28 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
100 L/kg12 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
55%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

129 kN·m/kg
91 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.8 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,710 kJ/m³
484 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.9 mm²/s
8.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale13-8 PH420J1

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability13-8 PH420J1
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionCondition AAnnealed
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 32 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, CrN, DLC, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing and 20 more.

13-8 PH vs 420J1 — frequently asked

Is 13-8 PH stronger than 420J1?

Yes. 13-8 PH has a typical yield strength of 827 MPa (120 ksi) against 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) for 420J1 — about 88% more. Tensile strength is 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 13-8 PH or 420J1?

420J1 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 13-8 PH is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 13-8 PH or 420J1?

420J1. Its machinability rates fair (48/100) against poor (32/100) for 13-8 PH; for welding the order is 13-8 PH first (good, 62/100) then 420J1 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 13-8 PH and 420J1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.