FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.6982 vs CA28MWV

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.6982 and CA28MWV are both stainless steel grades. CA28MWV is the stronger of the two: yield strength 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 640 MPa (92.8 ksi) for 1.6982, about 19% more; tensile strength follows at 1,035 MPa (150 ksi) vs 830 MPa (120 ksi). In exchange, 1.6982 is the more ductile: elongation 19% versus 13% for CA28MWV, and CA28MWV is harder (302 HB vs 250 HB). CA28MWV runs hotter in service (593°C vs 450°C continuous). On the shop floor, 1.6982 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 1.6982 welds better (very good vs poor).

1.6982Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

CA28MWVChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

1.6982 vs CA28MWV: properties

1.6982CA28MWV

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

77 GPa11.2 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

830 MPa120 ksi
1,035 MPa150 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

640 MPa92.8 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Elongation at Break

19%
13%

Reduction in Area

55%
35%

Compressive Strength

650 MPa94.3 ksi
780 MPa113 ksi

Shear Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

370 MPa53.7 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

100 J73.8 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

250 HB
302 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

24 HRC
32 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

265 HV
320 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Same in both: Density 7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.5 µm/m·K5.8 µin/in·°F
10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
593°C1,099 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.9 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
42 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.3 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

42 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
30%

Weldability

70 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

68 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

36 MJ/kg15,477 BTU/lb
39 MJ/kg16,767 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.8 kg CO₂/kg
3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

107 kN·m/kg
134 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.8 MN·m/kg
26.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,024 kJ/m³
1,409 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7 mm²/s
6.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCA28MWV1.6982

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.6982CA28MWV
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.6982 vs CA28MWV — frequently asked

Is CA28MWV stronger than 1.6982?

Yes. CA28MWV has a typical yield strength of 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 640 MPa (92.8 ksi) for 1.6982 — about 19% more. Tensile strength is 1,035 MPa (150 ksi) vs 830 MPa (120 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.6982 or CA28MWV?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1.6982 or CA28MWV?

1.6982. Its machinability rates fair (42/100) against poor (30/100) for CA28MWV; for welding the order is 1.6982 first (very good, 70/100) then CA28MWV (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.6982 and CA28MWV side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.