FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4515 vs CD3MCuN

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4515 and CD3MCuN are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 540 MPa — strength does not separate them. CD3MCuN is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 25% for 1.4515. On the shop floor, 1.4515 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than CD3MCuN (high, $$$$).

1.4515Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

CD3MCuNChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1.4515 vs CD3MCuN: properties

1.4515CD3MCuN

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

540 MPa78.3 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
32%

Reduction in Area

35%
45%

Compressive Strength

550 MPa79.8 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

45 J33.2 ft·lbf
80 J59 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

235 HB
230 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

22 HRC
21 HRC

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 740 MPa107 ksi · Shear Strength 450 MPa65.3 ksi · Hardness, Rockwell B 98 HRB · Hardness, Vickers 245 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,380°C2,516 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,465°C2,669 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Same in both: Density 7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
12.8 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

280°C536 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 16 W/m·K9.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.2 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.15 V · Corrosion Resistance 78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
22%

Weldability

60 / 100
62 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Castability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
47 MJ/kg20,206 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Modulus of Resilience

729 kJ/m³
756 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 95 kN·m/kg · Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.8 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 4.3 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCD3MCuN1.4515

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4515CD3MCuN
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4515 vs CD3MCuN — frequently asked

What is the difference between 1.4515 and CD3MCuN?

Stainless Steel 1.4515 and CD3MCuN are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 540 MPa — strength does not separate them. CD3MCuN is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 25% for 1.4515.

Which is cheaper, 1.4515 or CD3MCuN?

1.4515 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while CD3MCuN is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose 1.4515 over CD3MCuN?

Pick 1.4515 when cost is the deciding factor. Pick CD3MCuN when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4515 and CD3MCuN side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.