FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4474 vs CD3MCuN

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4474 and CD3MCuN are both stainless steel grades. CD3MCuN is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) for 1.4474, about 6% more. CD3MCuN is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 22% for 1.4474. On the shop floor, 1.4474 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than CD3MCuN (high, $$$$).

1.4474Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

CD3MCuNChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1.4474 vs CD3MCuN: properties

1.4474CD3MCuN

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

730 MPa106 ksi
740 MPa107 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
32%

Reduction in Area

35%
45%

Compressive Strength

520 MPa75.4 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

65 J47.9 ft·lbf
80 J59 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

235 HB
230 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

99 HRB
98 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

22 HRC
21 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

248 HV
245 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Shear Strength 450 MPa65.3 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,380°C2,516 °F

Same in both: Density 7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
12.8 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

280°C536 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 16 W/m·K9.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.2 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
78 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.15 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
22%

Weldability

55 / 100
62 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100 · Castability 65 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 35 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
47 MJ/kg20,206 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

150 L/kg18 gal/lb
190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

94 kN·m/kg
95 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

676 kJ/m³
756 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.8 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 4.3 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCD3MCuN1.4474

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4474CD3MCuN
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4474 vs CD3MCuN — frequently asked

Is CD3MCuN stronger than 1.4474?

Yes. CD3MCuN has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) for 1.4474 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 740 MPa (107 ksi) vs 730 MPa (106 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4474 or CD3MCuN?

1.4474 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while CD3MCuN is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 1.4474 or CD3MCuN?

CD3MCuN. Its weldability rates good (62/100) against good (55/100) for 1.4474.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4474 and CD3MCuN side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.