FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4362 vs 2101

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4362 and 2101 are both stainless steel grades. 2101 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) against 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) for 1.4362, about 15% more; tensile strength follows at 750 MPa (109 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). 2101 is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 32% for 1.4362. 1.4362 conducts heat better (17 W/m·K vs 15 W/m·K).

2101Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1.4362 vs 2101: properties

1.43622101

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

165 GPa23.9 Msi
166 GPa24.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
750 MPa109 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

460 MPa66.7 ksi
530 MPa76.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

32%
38%

Reduction in Area

60%
55%

Compressive Strength

470 MPa68.2 ksi
530 MPa76.9 ksi

Shear Strength

440 MPa63.8 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

200 J148 ft·lbf
150 J111 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

240 HV
250 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 400 MPa58 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in · Hardness, Brinell 230 HB · Hardness, Rockwell B 98 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,385°C2,525 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,455°C2,651 °F
1,465°C2,669 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

17 W/m·K9.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 13 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.2 % IACS
2.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in
6.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
66 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
28%

Weldability

72 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

62 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 55 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4 kg CO₂/kg
3.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
65%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 48 MJ/kg20,636 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

90 kN·m/kg
96 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.8 MN·m/kg
25.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

529 kJ/m³
702 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.6 mm²/s
3.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.43622101

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.43622101
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Solution Annealed
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Passivation (Stainless Steel)—Yes

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4362 vs 2101 — frequently asked

Is 2101 stronger than 1.4362?

Yes. 2101 has a typical yield strength of 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) against 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) for 1.4362 — about 15% more. Tensile strength is 750 MPa (109 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4362 or 2101?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose 1.4362 over 2101?

Pick 2101 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4362 and 2101 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.