FabDigitFabDigit

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Pb50Sn50 vs Pb69Sn30Sb1

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy · grade comparison

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Pb50Sn50 and Pb69Sn30Sb1 are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Both yield at about 27 MPa — strength does not separate them. Pb50Sn50 is the more ductile: elongation 55% versus 35% for Pb69Sn30Sb1, and Pb50Sn50 is harder (14 HB vs 13 HB). Pb50Sn50 is lighter (8.85 g/cm³ vs 9.7 g/cm³ for Pb69Sn30Sb1) and Pb69Sn30Sb1 is stiffer (25 GPa vs 23 GPa).

Pb50Sn50Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Pb50Sn50 vs Pb69Sn30Sb1: properties

Pb50Sn50Pb69Sn30Sb1

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

23 GPa3.3 Msi
25 GPa3.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

8.5 GPa1.2 Msi
9.5 GPa1.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

27 MPa3.9 ksi
26 MPa3.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

55%
35%

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

14 MPa2 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

14 HB
13 HB

Hardness, Vickers

13 HV
14 HV

Compressive Strength

—
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 42 MPa6.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.85 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
9.7 g/cm³0.35 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

216°C421 °F
255°C491 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 183°C361 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
46 W/m·K26.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

176 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F
155 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

24.5 µm/m·K13.6 µin/in·°F
26 µm/m·K14.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

42 J/g18.1 BTU/lb
38 J/g16.3 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 100°C212 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10.9 % IACS
9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.58×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.22 µΩ·in
1.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.48 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.32 V
-0.5 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
—

Weldability

15 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
90 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

98 / 100
88 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

160 MJ/kg68,788 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

10.5 kg CO₂/kg
7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
55%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

5 kN·m/kg
4 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

16 kJ/m³
14 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

32.1 mm²/s
30.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 2.6 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every solder & low-melting alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

125102050891011Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePb50Sn50Pb69Sn30Sb1

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPb50Sn50Pb69Sn30Sb1
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Pb50Sn50 vs Pb69Sn30Sb1 — frequently asked

What is the difference between Pb50Sn50 and Pb69Sn30Sb1?

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Pb50Sn50 and Pb69Sn30Sb1 are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Both yield at about 27 MPa — strength does not separate them. Pb50Sn50 is the more ductile: elongation 55% versus 35% for Pb69Sn30Sb1, and Pb50Sn50 is harder (14 HB vs 13 HB).

Which is cheaper, Pb50Sn50 or Pb69Sn30Sb1?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Pb50Sn50 or Pb69Sn30Sb1?

Pb69Sn30Sb1. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (30/100) for Pb50Sn50; for welding the order is Pb69Sn30Sb1 first (poor, 20/100) then Pb50Sn50 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Pb50Sn50 and Pb69Sn30Sb1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.