Refractory Metal AlBeMet AM200 vs S-65C
Refractory Metal · grade comparison
Refractory Metal AlBeMet AM200 and S-65C are both refractory metal grades. S-65C is the stronger of the two: yield strength 241 MPa (35 ksi) against 200 MPa (29 ksi) for AlBeMet AM200, about 21% more; tensile strength follows at 324 MPa (47 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi). S-65C is the more ductile: elongation 4.5% versus 3% for AlBeMet AM200, and AlBeMet AM200 is harder (100 HB vs 90 HB). S-65C is lighter (1.85 g/cm³ vs 2.13 g/cm³ for AlBeMet AM200) and S-65C is stiffer (303 GPa vs 188 GPa).
S-65CChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
AlBeMet AM200 vs S-65C: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all refractory metal grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all refractory metal grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 210 W/m·K121 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 42 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 4.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.61 µΩ·in
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | AlBeMet AM200 | S-65C |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
AlBeMet AM200 vs S-65C — frequently asked
Is S-65C stronger than AlBeMet AM200?
Yes. S-65C has a typical yield strength of 241 MPa (35 ksi) against 200 MPa (29 ksi) for AlBeMet AM200 — about 21% more. Tensile strength is 324 MPa (47 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi).
Which is cheaper, AlBeMet AM200 or S-65C?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, AlBeMet AM200 or S-65C?
S-65C, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 40/100 against 35/100 for AlBeMet AM200; for welding the order is AlBeMet AM200 first (poor, 20/100) then S-65C (poor, 15/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AlBeMet AM200 and S-65C side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.