FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal AlBeMet AM200 vs S-200F

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal AlBeMet AM200 and S-200F are both refractory metal grades. S-200F is the stronger of the two: yield strength 262 MPa (38 ksi) against 200 MPa (29 ksi) for AlBeMet AM200, about 31% more; tensile strength follows at 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi). S-200F is harder — 150 HB against 100 HB for AlBeMet AM200 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. S-200F is lighter (1.85 g/cm³ vs 2.13 g/cm³ for AlBeMet AM200) and S-200F is stiffer (303 GPa vs 188 GPa).

S-200FChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

AlBeMet AM200 vs S-200F: properties

AlBeMet AM200S-200F

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

188 GPa27.3 Msi
303 GPa43.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
142 GPa20.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
116 GPa16.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.17
0.08

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
370 MPa53.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

200 MPa29 ksi
262 MPa38 ksi

Reduction in Area

4%
2%

Compressive Strength

240 MPa34.8 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Shear Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

160 MPa23.2 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

14 MPa·√m12.7 ksi·√in
11 MPa·√m10 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
1 J1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

100 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

70 HRB
80 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

105 HV
170 HV

Same in both: Elongation at Break 3%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.13 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
1.85 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

645°C1,193 °F
1,287°C2,349 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,250°C2,282 °F
1,290°C2,354 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

210 W/m·K121 BTU/hr·ft·°F
216 W/m·K125 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,925 J/kg·K0.46 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

14.5 µm/m·K8.1 µin/in·°F
11.3 µm/m·K6.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
500°C932 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-250°C-418 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
1,350 J/g580 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

42 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.61 µΩ·in
4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.82 V
-0.9 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
10 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 35 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30% · Weldability 20 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

900 MJ/kg386,931 BTU/lb
1,400 MJ/kg601,892 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

60 kg CO₂/kg
90 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

10%
15%

Embodied Water

—
2,500 L/kg300 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

129 kN·m/kg
200 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

88.3 MN·m/kg
163.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

106 kJ/m³
113 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

65.7 mm²/s
60.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

21
23

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleS-200FAlBeMet AM200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlBeMet AM200S-200F
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

AlBeMet AM200 vs S-200F — frequently asked

Is S-200F stronger than AlBeMet AM200?

Yes. S-200F has a typical yield strength of 262 MPa (38 ksi) against 200 MPa (29 ksi) for AlBeMet AM200 — about 31% more. Tensile strength is 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AlBeMet AM200 or S-200F?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose AlBeMet AM200 over S-200F?

Pick S-200F when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AlBeMet AM200 and S-200F side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.