FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal Argentium 935 vs IC-Ag99.99

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal Argentium 935 and IC-Ag99.99 are both precious metal grades. Argentium 935 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for IC-Ag99.99, about 78% more; tensile strength follows at 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) vs 140 MPa (20.3 ksi). Argentium 935 is harder — 48 HB against 25 HB for IC-Ag99.99 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. IC-Ag99.99 runs hotter in service (500°C vs 200°C continuous) and IC-Ag99.99 conducts heat better (429 W/m·K vs 330 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Argentium 935 machines more easily (good vs fair) and Argentium 935 welds better (excellent vs good).

Argentium 935Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

IC-Ag99.99Choose it when the part sees heat.

Argentium 935 vs IC-Ag99.99: properties

Argentium 935IC-Ag99.99

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

28 GPa4.1 Msi
29 GPa4.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
100 GPa14.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

80 MPa11.6 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Reduction in Area

50%
80%

Shear Strength

170 MPa24.7 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

48 HB
25 HB

Hardness, Vickers

50 HV
26 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 76 GPa11 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.37 · Elongation at Break 45%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.3 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³
10.49 g/cm³0.38 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

800°C1,472 °F
962°C1,763 °F

Liquidus Temperature

890°C1,634 °F
962°C1,763 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

330 W/m·K191 BTU/hr·ft·°F
429 W/m·K248 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.9 µm/m·K10.5 µin/in·°F
19.5 µm/m·K10.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
500°C932 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-250°C-418 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 235 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 105 J/g45.1 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

80 % IACS
106 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.846 µΩ·in
1.59×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.626 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) 0.05 V · Corrosion Resistance 78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
40%

Weldability

90 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
98 / 100

Castability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

96 / 100
95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,600 MJ/kg687,877 BTU/lb
1,500 MJ/kg644,885 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

120 kg CO₂/kg
110 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

60%
30%

Embodied Water

—
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
13 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

7.4 MN·m/kg
7.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

42 kJ/m³
13 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

136.3 mm²/s
174 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

60
41

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleArgentium 935IC-Ag99.99

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityArgentium 935IC-Ag99.99
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Argentium 935 vs IC-Ag99.99 — frequently asked

Is Argentium 935 stronger than IC-Ag99.99?

Yes. Argentium 935 has a typical yield strength of 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for IC-Ag99.99 — about 78% more. Tensile strength is 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) vs 140 MPa (20.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Argentium 935 or IC-Ag99.99?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Argentium 935 or IC-Ag99.99?

Argentium 935. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for IC-Ag99.99; for welding the order is Argentium 935 first (excellent, 90/100) then IC-Ag99.99 (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Argentium 935 and IC-Ag99.99 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.