FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal 835 Silver vs Argentium 935

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal 835 Silver and Argentium 935 are both precious metal grades. 835 Silver is the stronger of the two: yield strength 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for Argentium 935, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) vs 260 MPa (37.7 ksi). In exchange, Argentium 935 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 40% for 835 Silver, and 835 Silver is harder (57 HB vs 48 HB). 835 Silver is stiffer (80 GPa vs 76 GPa). On the shop floor, Argentium 935 welds better (excellent vs good).

835 SilverChoose it when strength drives the design.

Argentium 935Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

835 Silver vs Argentium 935: properties

835 SilverArgentium 935

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Shear Modulus

30 GPa4.4 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

106 GPa15.4 Msi
102 GPa14.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
45%

Shear Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

57 HB
48 HB

Hardness, Vickers

60 HV
50 HV

Reduction in Area

—
50%

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.37

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.2 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³
10.3 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

779°C1,434 °F
800°C1,472 °F

Liquidus Temperature

815°C1,499 °F
890°C1,634 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

320 W/m·K185 BTU/hr·ft·°F
330 W/m·K191 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

255 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
235 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19 µm/m·K10.6 µin/in·°F
18.9 µm/m·K10.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

120 J/g51.6 BTU/lb
105 J/g45.1 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 80 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 2.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.846 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

0.12 V
0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

92 / 100
96 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 55% · Castability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,300 MJ/kg558,900 BTU/lb
1,600 MJ/kg687,877 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

105 kg CO₂/kg
120 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

280 L/kg33.6 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

50%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

29 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

7.8 MN·m/kg
7.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

76 kJ/m³
42 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

123 mm²/s
136.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

63
60

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleArgentium 935835 Silver

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability835 SilverArgentium 935
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

835 Silver vs Argentium 935 — frequently asked

Is 835 Silver stronger than Argentium 935?

Yes. 835 Silver has a typical yield strength of 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for Argentium 935 — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) vs 260 MPa (37.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 835 Silver or Argentium 935?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 835 Silver or Argentium 935?

Argentium 935. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (50/100) for 835 Silver; for welding the order is Argentium 935 first (excellent, 90/100) then 835 Silver (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 835 Silver and Argentium 935 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.