FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal 950 Silver (Minerve) vs Argentium 935

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal 950 Silver (Minerve) and Argentium 935 are both precious metal grades. Argentium 935 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 65 MPa (9.43 ksi) for 950 Silver (Minerve), about 23% more. 950 Silver (Minerve) is harder — 52 HB against 48 HB for Argentium 935 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 950 Silver (Minerve) conducts heat better (380 W/m·K vs 330 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Argentium 935 welds better (excellent vs very good).

950 Silver (Minerve)Choose it when surface hardness matters.

Argentium 935Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

950 Silver (Minerve) vs Argentium 935: properties

950 Silver (Minerve)Argentium 935

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

101 GPa14.6 Msi
102 GPa14.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

65 MPa9.4 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

52 HB
48 HB

Hardness, Vickers

55 HV
50 HV

Reduction in Area

—
50%

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 76 GPa11 Msi · Shear Modulus 28 GPa4.1 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.37 · Elongation at Break 45%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.42 g/cm³0.38 lb/in³
10.3 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

875°C1,607 °F
800°C1,472 °F

Liquidus Temperature

915°C1,679 °F
890°C1,634 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

380 W/m·K220 BTU/hr·ft·°F
330 W/m·K191 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

236 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
235 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19 µm/m·K10.6 µin/in·°F
18.9 µm/m·K10.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

106 J/g45.6 BTU/lb
105 J/g45.1 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

92 % IACS
80 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.736 µΩ·in
2.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.846 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.05 V
0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
90 / 100

Castability

78 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

95 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

97 / 100
96 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 55% · Formability (cold) 95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,500 MJ/kg644,885 BTU/lb
1,600 MJ/kg687,877 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

105 kg CO₂/kg
120 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

35%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

24 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

7.3 MN·m/kg
7.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

28 kJ/m³
42 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

154.5 mm²/s
136.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

66
60

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleArgentium 935950 Silver (Minerve)

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability950 Silver (Minerve)Argentium 935
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

950 Silver (Minerve) vs Argentium 935 — frequently asked

Is Argentium 935 stronger than 950 Silver (Minerve)?

Yes. Argentium 935 has a typical yield strength of 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 65 MPa (9.43 ksi) for 950 Silver (Minerve) — about 23% more. Tensile strength is 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 950 Silver (Minerve) or Argentium 935?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 950 Silver (Minerve) or Argentium 935?

950 Silver (Minerve), by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for Argentium 935; for welding the order is Argentium 935 first (excellent, 90/100) then 950 Silver (Minerve) (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 950 Silver (Minerve) and Argentium 935 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.