FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal AgSnO2In2O3 vs B685

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal AgSnO2In2O3 and B685 are both precious metal grades. B685 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) against 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) for AgSnO2In2O3, about 79% more. B685 is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 9% for AgSnO2In2O3, and B685 is harder (145 HB vs 90 HB). AgSnO2In2O3 is lighter (9.95 g/cm³ vs 10.4 g/cm³ for B685) and B685 is stiffer (130 GPa vs 88 GPa). On the shop floor, AgSnO2In2O3 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and B685 welds better (good vs poor).

AgSnO2In2O3Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

B685Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AgSnO2In2O3 vs B685: properties

AgSnO2In2O3B685

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

88 GPa12.8 Msi
130 GPa18.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

32 GPa4.6 Msi
48 GPa7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

104 GPa15.1 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

205 MPa29.7 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Elongation at Break

9%
30%

Shear Strength

175 MPa25.4 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

90 HB
145 HB

Hardness, Vickers

95 HV
150 HV

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

—
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
78 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.37

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

9.95 g/cm³0.36 lb/in³
10.4 g/cm³0.38 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

960°C1,760 °F
1,200°C2,192 °F

Liquidus Temperature

962°C1,764 °F
1,230°C2,246 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

320 W/m·K185 BTU/hr·ft·°F
22 W/m·K12.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

240 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
300 J/kg·K0.07 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F
14 µm/m·K7.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

95 J/g40.8 BTU/lb
176 J/g75.7 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
450°C842 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

66 % IACS
5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.61×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.03 µΩ·in
3.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m13.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

0.1 V
0.15 V

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

30 / 100
62 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
90 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
22%

Castability

—
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,500 MJ/kg644,885 BTU/lb
24,000 MJ/kg1.03×10⁷ BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

130 kg CO₂/kg
2,200 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

25,000 L/kg2,996 gal/lb
90,000 L/kg10,784 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

28 kN·m/kg
48 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

8.8 MN·m/kg
12.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

239 kJ/m³
154 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

134 mm²/s
7.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

58
6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAgSnO2In2O3B685

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAgSnO2In2O3B685
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

AgSnO2In2O3 vs B685 — frequently asked

Is B685 stronger than AgSnO2In2O3?

Yes. B685 has a typical tensile strength of 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) against 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) for AgSnO2In2O3 — about 79% more.

Which is cheaper, AgSnO2In2O3 or B685?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AgSnO2In2O3 or B685?

AgSnO2In2O3. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (30/100) for B685; for welding the order is B685 first (good, 62/100) then AgSnO2In2O3 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AgSnO2In2O3 and B685 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.