FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal AgCdO12 vs AgSnO2In2O3

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal AgCdO12 and AgSnO2In2O3 are both precious metal grades. Both yield at about 200 MPa — strength does not separate them. AgCdO12 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 9% for AgSnO2In2O3, and AgSnO2In2O3 is harder (90 HB vs 80 HB). AgSnO2In2O3 is stiffer (88 GPa vs 80 GPa) and AgCdO12 conducts electricity better (80 % IACS vs 66 % IACS). On the shop floor, AgCdO12 machines more easily (good vs fair).

AgCdO12Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

AgCdO12 vs AgSnO2In2O3: properties

AgCdO12AgSnO2In2O3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
88 GPa12.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

30 GPa4.4 Msi
32 GPa4.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
104 GPa15.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

270 MPa39.2 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

200 MPa29 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
9%

Reduction in Area

25%
—

Compressive Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
—

Shear Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
—

Hardness, Brinell

80 HB
90 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

40 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

85 HV
95 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.37

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.2 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³
9.95 g/cm³0.36 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 960°C1,760 °F · Liquidus Temperature 962°C1,764 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

330 W/m·K191 BTU/hr·ft·°F
320 W/m·K185 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19 µm/m·K10.6 µin/in·°F
17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

92 J/g39.6 BTU/lb
95 J/g40.8 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 240 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 250°C482 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

80 % IACS
66 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.846 µΩ·in
2.61×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.03 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) 0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
—

Weldability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,300 MJ/kg558,900 BTU/lb
1,500 MJ/kg644,885 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

110 kg CO₂/kg
130 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

2,000 L/kg240 gal/lb
25,000 L/kg2,996 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
28 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

7.8 MN·m/kg
8.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

250 kJ/m³
239 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

134.8 mm²/s
134 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

59
58

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAgSnO2In2O3AgCdO12

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAgCdO12AgSnO2In2O3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

AgCdO12 vs AgSnO2In2O3 — frequently asked

What is the difference between AgCdO12 and AgSnO2In2O3?

Precious Metal AgCdO12 and AgSnO2In2O3 are both precious metal grades. Both yield at about 200 MPa — strength does not separate them. AgCdO12 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 9% for AgSnO2In2O3, and AgSnO2In2O3 is harder (90 HB vs 80 HB).

Which is cheaper, AgCdO12 or AgSnO2In2O3?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AgCdO12 or AgSnO2In2O3?

AgCdO12. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (40/100) for AgSnO2In2O3; for welding the order is AgSnO2In2O3 first (poor, 30/100) then AgCdO12 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AgCdO12 and AgSnO2In2O3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.