FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal 92Ag-8SnO2 vs AgC10

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal 92Ag-8SnO2 and AgC10 are both precious metal grades. 92Ag-8SnO2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for AgC10, about 57% more; tensile strength follows at 225 MPa (32.6 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi). 92Ag-8SnO2 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 4% for AgC10, and 92Ag-8SnO2 is harder (57 HB vs 30 HB). AgC10 is lighter (7.6 g/cm³ vs 10.1 g/cm³ for 92Ag-8SnO2) and 92Ag-8SnO2 is stiffer (88 GPa vs 55 GPa). On the shop floor, AgC10 machines more easily (good vs fair) and 92Ag-8SnO2 welds better (25 vs 15 out of 100).

92Ag-8SnO2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AgC10Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

92Ag-8SnO2 vs AgC10: properties

92Ag-8SnO2AgC10

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

88 GPa12.8 Msi
55 GPa8 Msi

Shear Modulus

32 GPa4.6 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.37
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

225 MPa32.6 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
4%

Shear Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
—

Hardness, Brinell

57 HB
30 HB

Hardness, Vickers

60 HV
—

Compressive Strength

—
200 MPa29 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.1 g/cm³0.36 lb/in³
7.6 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 961°C1,762 °F · Liquidus Temperature 961°C1,762 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

345 W/m·K199 BTU/hr·ft·°F
200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

240 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
280 J/kg·K0.07 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19 µm/m·K10.6 µin/in·°F
16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 100 J/g43 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

82 % IACS
48 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.827 µΩ·in
3.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.42 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

0.05 V
0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
—

Weldability

25 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,450 MJ/kg623,388 BTU/lb
1,300 MJ/kg558,900 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

110 kg CO₂/kg
90 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

2,000 L/kg240 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

22 kN·m/kg
14 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

8.7 MN·m/kg
7.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

69 kJ/m³
45 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

142.3 mm²/s
94 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

46
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAgC1092Ag-8SnO2

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability92Ag-8SnO2AgC10
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

92Ag-8SnO2 vs AgC10 — frequently asked

Is 92Ag-8SnO2 stronger than AgC10?

Yes. 92Ag-8SnO2 has a typical yield strength of 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for AgC10 — about 57% more. Tensile strength is 225 MPa (32.6 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 92Ag-8SnO2 or AgC10?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 92Ag-8SnO2 or AgC10?

AgC10. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for 92Ag-8SnO2; for welding the order is 92Ag-8SnO2 first (poor, 25/100) then AgC10 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 92Ag-8SnO2 and AgC10 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.