FabDigitFabDigit

Torlon 4301 vs TP-PI

Polymer · grade comparison

Torlon 4301 and TP-PI are both polymer grades. Torlon 4301 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 108 MPa (15.7 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for TP-PI, about 20% more; tensile strength follows at 117 MPa (17 ksi) vs 92 MPa (13.3 ksi). In exchange, TP-PI is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 7% for Torlon 4301. TP-PI is lighter (1.33 g/cm³ vs 1.46 g/cm³ for Torlon 4301) and Torlon 4301 is stiffer (6.8 GPa vs 2.9 GPa). On the shop floor, TP-PI welds better (poor vs not recommended).

Torlon 4301Choose it when strength drives the design.

TP-PIChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Torlon 4301 vs TP-PI: properties

Torlon 4301TP-PI

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

6.8 GPa0.99 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

117 MPa17 ksi
92 MPa13.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

108 MPa15.7 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

7%
40%

Compressive Strength

166 MPa24.1 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

5 GPa0.73 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Flexural Strength

176 MPa25.5 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

6.5 GPa0.94 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
78 MPa11.3 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in
55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

105 HRM
100 HRM

Shear Modulus

—
1.1 GPa0.15 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
125 HRR

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in · Hardness, Shore D 88 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.46 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.33 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

275°C527 °F
250°C482 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.28%
0.24%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.9%
1.2%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
388°C730 °F

Refractive Index

—
1.7

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.54 W/m·K0.31 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.29 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F
1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
50 µm/m·K27.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
240°C464 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-269°C-452 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

285°C545 °F
250°C482 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

279°C534 °F
238°C460 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

44%
47%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

280°C536 °F
300°C572 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
255°C491 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

—
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

—
3.2

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.002

Volume Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
175 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
88 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

50 / 100
60 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

5 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
1.4%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

350°C662 °F
410°C770 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

215°C419 °F
200°C392 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
3 g/10 min

Same in both: Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

—
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 15 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

80 kN·m/kg
69 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

4.7 MN·m/kg
2.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

858 kJ/m³
1,397 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.4 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTorlon 4301TP-PI

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityTorlon 4301TP-PI
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Torlon 4301 vs TP-PI — frequently asked

Is Torlon 4301 stronger than TP-PI?

Yes. Torlon 4301 has a typical yield strength of 108 MPa (15.7 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for TP-PI — about 20% more. Tensile strength is 117 MPa (17 ksi) vs 92 MPa (13.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Torlon 4301 or TP-PI?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Torlon 4301 or TP-PI?

TP-PI, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for Torlon 4301; for welding the order is TP-PI first (poor, 25/100) then Torlon 4301 (not recommended, 5/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Torlon 4301 and TP-PI side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.