FabDigitFabDigit

Aurum PD450 vs Torlon 4301

Polymer · grade comparison

Aurum PD450 and Torlon 4301 are both polymer grades. Torlon 4301 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 108 MPa (15.7 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for Aurum PD450, about 20% more; tensile strength follows at 117 MPa (17 ksi) vs 92 MPa (13.3 ksi). In exchange, Aurum PD450 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 7% for Torlon 4301. Aurum PD450 is lighter (1.33 g/cm³ vs 1.46 g/cm³ for Torlon 4301) and Torlon 4301 is stiffer (6.8 GPa vs 2.9 GPa). On the shop floor, Aurum PD450 machines more easily (65 vs 55 out of 100) and Aurum PD450 welds better (fair vs not recommended).

Aurum PD450Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Torlon 4301Choose it when strength drives the design.

Aurum PD450 vs Torlon 4301: properties

Aurum PD450Torlon 4301

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.9 GPa0.42 Msi
6.8 GPa0.99 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

92 MPa13.3 ksi
117 MPa17 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
108 MPa15.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
7%

Compressive Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
166 MPa24.1 ksi

Flexural Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
176 MPa25.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
6.5 GPa0.94 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in
60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

90 HRM
105 HRM

Compressive Modulus

—
5 GPa0.73 Msi

Shear Strength

—
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Shore D

—
88 Shore D

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.33 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.46 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

388°C730 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

250°C482 °F
275°C527 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.24%
0.28%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
1.9%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.29 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.54 W/m·K0.31 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F
1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

52 µm/m·K28.9 µin/in·°F
25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

240°C464 °F
250°C482 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

290°C554 °F
285°C545 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

238°C460 °F
279°C534 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

47%
44%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
280°C536 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.3
—

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.002
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
—

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

175 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
50 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
5 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
5 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.5%
0.3%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

410°C770 °F
350°C662 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
215°C419 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

320 MJ/kg137,575 BTU/lb
300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

16 kg CO₂/kg
15 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

69 kN·m/kg
80 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
4.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,397 kJ/m³
858 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTorlon 4301Aurum PD450

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAurum PD450Torlon 4301
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Aurum PD450 vs Torlon 4301 — frequently asked

Is Torlon 4301 stronger than Aurum PD450?

Yes. Torlon 4301 has a typical yield strength of 108 MPa (15.7 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for Aurum PD450 — about 20% more. Tensile strength is 117 MPa (17 ksi) vs 92 MPa (13.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Aurum PD450 or Torlon 4301?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Aurum PD450 or Torlon 4301?

Aurum PD450, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 55/100 for Torlon 4301; for welding the order is Aurum PD450 first (fair, 45/100) then Torlon 4301 (not recommended, 5/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Aurum PD450 and Torlon 4301 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.