FabDigitFabDigit

PP-T20 vs TPO

Polymer · grade comparison

PP-T20 and TPO are both polymer grades. PP-T20 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 29 MPa (4.21 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for TPO, about 142% more; tensile strength follows at 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 15 MPa (2.18 ksi). In exchange, TPO is the more ductile: elongation 400% versus 12% for PP-T20, and PP-T20 is harder (72 Shore D vs 45 Shore D). TPO is lighter (0.89 g/cm³ vs 1.05 g/cm³ for PP-T20) and PP-T20 is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 0.6 GPa). On the shop floor, TPO welds better (80 vs 70 out of 100) and PP-T20 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than TPO (standard, $$).

PP-T20Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

TPOChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PP-T20 vs TPO: properties

PP-T20TPO

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
0.6 GPa0.09 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
0.21 GPa0.03 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.42

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

29 MPa4.2 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
400%

Compressive Strength

42 MPa6.1 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Flexural Strength

44 MPa6.4 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.5 GPa0.36 Msi
0.55 GPa0.08 Msi

Shear Strength

24 MPa3.5 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in
600 J/m11.2 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

72 Shore D
45 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

97 HRR
60 HRR

Hardness, Shore A

—
92 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
60 kN/m343 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
55%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.05 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
0.89 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

165°C329 °F
163°C325 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-10°C14 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.05%
0.02%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.15%
0.05%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.27 W/m·K0.16 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

105°C221 °F
90°C194 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

120°C248 °F
75°C167 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

65°C149 °F
45°C113 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

152°C306 °F
65°C149 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

140°C284 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 18%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.8
2.3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.0012
6×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
50 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.1%
1.3%

Melt Flow Rate

12 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

225°C437 °F
215°C419 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

45°C113 °F
40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb
82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb
110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

29 kN·m/kg
17 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.3 MN·m/kg
0.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

175 kJ/m³
120 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePP-T20TPO

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPP-T20TPO
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PP-T20 vs TPO — frequently asked

Is PP-T20 stronger than TPO?

Yes. PP-T20 has a typical yield strength of 29 MPa (4.21 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for TPO — about 142% more. Tensile strength is 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 15 MPa (2.18 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PP-T20 or TPO?

PP-T20 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while TPO is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PP-T20 or TPO?

PP-T20. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (50/100) for TPO; for welding the order is TPO first (very good, 80/100) then PP-T20 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PP-T20 and TPO side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.