FabDigitFabDigit

PP-GF30 vs PP-T20

Polymer · grade comparison

PP-GF30 and PP-T20 are both polymer grades. PP-GF30 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 85 MPa (12.3 ksi) against 29 MPa (4.21 ksi) for PP-T20, about 193% more; tensile strength follows at 85 MPa (12.3 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi). In exchange, PP-T20 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 3% for PP-GF30, and PP-GF30 is harder (80 Shore D vs 72 Shore D). PP-T20 is lighter (1.05 g/cm³ vs 1.13 g/cm³ for PP-GF30) and PP-GF30 is stiffer (6 GPa vs 2.4 GPa). On the shop floor, PP-T20 machines more easily (good vs fair), PP-T20 welds better (very good vs fair), and PP-T20 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PP-GF30 (standard, $$).

PP-GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PP-T20Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PP-GF30 vs PP-T20: properties

PP-GF30PP-T20

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

6 GPa0.87 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.39
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

85 MPa12.3 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

85 MPa12.3 ksi
29 MPa4.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
12%

Compressive Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

5.5 GPa0.8 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

125 MPa18.1 ksi
44 MPa6.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

5.8 GPa0.84 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
24 MPa3.5 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in
45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

80 Shore D
72 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
97 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.85 GPa0.12 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.13 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.05 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-8°C18 °F
-10°C14 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.06%
0.05%

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 165°C329 °F · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.15%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

30 µm/m·K16.7 µin/in·°F
80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

115°C239 °F
105°C221 °F

Min Service Temperature

-25°C-13 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

160°C320 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

152°C306 °F
65°C149 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

158°C316 °F
152°C306 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

145°C293 °F
140°C284 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.27 W/m·K0.16 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

28 kV/mm711 V/mil
24 kV/mm610 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
2.8

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.004
0.0012

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
58 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

25 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
1.1%

Melt Flow Rate

6 g/10 min
12 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

240°C464 °F
225°C437 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

65°C149 °F
45°C113 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb
72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

80 L/kg9.6 gal/lb
90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

75 kN·m/kg
29 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

5.3 MN·m/kg
2.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

602 kJ/m³
175 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePP-GF30PP-T20

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPP-GF30PP-T20
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PP-GF30 vs PP-T20 — frequently asked

Is PP-GF30 stronger than PP-T20?

Yes. PP-GF30 has a typical yield strength of 85 MPa (12.3 ksi) against 29 MPa (4.21 ksi) for PP-T20 — about 193% more. Tensile strength is 85 MPa (12.3 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PP-GF30 or PP-T20?

PP-T20 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PP-GF30 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PP-GF30 or PP-T20?

PP-T20. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (45/100) for PP-GF30; for welding the order is PP-T20 first (very good, 70/100) then PP-GF30 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PP-GF30 and PP-T20 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.