FabDigitFabDigit

PP-H vs PP-T20

Polymer · grade comparison

PP-H and PP-T20 are both polymer grades. PP-H is the stronger of the two: yield strength 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 29 MPa (4.21 ksi) for PP-T20, about 17% more; tensile strength follows at 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi). PP-H is the more ductile: elongation 300% versus 12% for PP-T20. PP-H is lighter (0.91 g/cm³ vs 1.05 g/cm³ for PP-T20) and PP-T20 is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 1.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PP-H welds better (excellent vs very good).

PP-HChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PP-H vs PP-T20: properties

PP-HPP-T20

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.5 GPa0.07 Msi
0.85 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

35 MPa5.1 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

34 MPa4.9 ksi
29 MPa4.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

300%
12%

Compressive Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
44 MPa6.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
24 MPa3.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in
45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

68 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

96 HRR
97 HRR

Same in both: Hardness, Shore D 72 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.91 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
1.05 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.05%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.15%

Refractive Index

1.49
—

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 165°C329 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) -10°C14 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.27 W/m·K0.16 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F
80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
105°C221 °F

Min Service Temperature

-10°C14 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

100°C212 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

60°C140 °F
65°C149 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

90°C194 °F
152°C306 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
140°C284 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

28 kV/mm711 V/mil
24 kV/mm610 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.25
2.8

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

3×10⁻⁴
0.0012

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

20 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
58 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.6%
1.1%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

230°C446 °F
225°C437 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

35°C95 °F
45°C113 °F

Same in both: Melt Flow Rate 12 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

100 L/kg12 gal/lb
90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

3%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

39 kN·m/kg
29 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.7 MN·m/kg
2.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

385 kJ/m³
175 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePP-HPP-T20

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPP-HPP-T20
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PP-H vs PP-T20 — frequently asked

Is PP-H stronger than PP-T20?

Yes. PP-H has a typical yield strength of 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 29 MPa (4.21 ksi) for PP-T20 — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PP-H or PP-T20?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PP-H or PP-T20?

PP-H, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 58/100 for PP-T20; for welding the order is PP-H first (excellent, 90/100) then PP-T20 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PP-H and PP-T20 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.