FabDigitFabDigit

POM-C GF25 vs POM-H

Polymer · grade comparison

POM-C GF25 and POM-H are both polymer grades. POM-C GF25 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for POM-H, about 64% more. In exchange, POM-H is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 3% for POM-C GF25. POM-H is lighter (1.42 g/cm³ vs 1.6 g/cm³ for POM-C GF25) and POM-C GF25 is stiffer (8.5 GPa vs 3.1 GPa). On the shop floor, POM-H machines more easily (excellent vs very good).

POM-C GF25Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

POM-HChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

POM-C GF25 vs POM-H: properties

POM-C GF25POM-H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

8.5 GPa1.2 Msi
3.1 GPa0.45 Msi

Shear Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
30%

Compressive Modulus

7 GPa1 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Flexural Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

8 GPa1.2 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Shear Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in
80 J/m1.5 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

88 Shore D
86 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

90 HRM
94 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
120 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in

Same in both: Compressive Strength 110 MPa16 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.6 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.42 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

165°C329 °F
175°C347 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.25%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.65%
0.9%

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) -60°C-76 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.35 W/m·K0.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.31 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

35 µm/m·K19.4 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

105°C221 °F
95°C203 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

158°C316 °F
100°C212 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

163°C325 °F
160°C320 °F

Same in both: Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa 165°C329 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 15% · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 140°C284 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4
3.7

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.006
0.005

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
72 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
2.1%

Melt Flow Rate

6 g/10 min
13 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

205°C401 °F
215°C419 °F

Same in both: Weldability 40 / 100 · Mold Temperature (typ.) 90°C194 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb
103 MJ/kg44,282 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

72 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

5.3 MN·m/kg
2.2 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePOM-H

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPOM-C GF25POM-H
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

POM-C GF25 vs POM-H — frequently asked

Is POM-C GF25 stronger than POM-H?

Yes. POM-C GF25 has a typical tensile strength of 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for POM-H — about 64% more.

Which is cheaper, POM-C GF25 or POM-H?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, POM-C GF25 or POM-H?

POM-H. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (75/100) for POM-C GF25.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in POM-C GF25 and POM-H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.