FabDigitFabDigit

POM-C+PTFE vs POM-H HI

Polymer · grade comparison

POM-C+PTFE and POM-H HI are both polymer grades. POM-C+PTFE is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for POM-H HI, about 7% more. In exchange, POM-H HI is the more ductile: elongation 220% versus 20% for POM-C+PTFE, and POM-C+PTFE is harder (79 Shore D vs 72 Shore D). POM-H HI is lighter (1.34 g/cm³ vs 1.54 g/cm³ for POM-C+PTFE) and POM-C+PTFE is stiffer (2.7 GPa vs 1.4 GPa). On the shop floor, POM-C+PTFE machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and POM-H HI welds better (fair vs not recommended).

POM-C+PTFEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

POM-H HIChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

POM-C+PTFE vs POM-H HI: properties

POM-C+PTFEPOM-H HI

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.7 GPa0.39 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

1 GPa0.15 Msi
0.5 GPa0.07 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.58 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

48 MPa7 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

46 MPa6.7 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
220%

Compressive Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

62 MPa9 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.5 GPa0.36 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
6.5 MPa·√m5.9 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in
900 J/m16.9 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

79 Shore D
72 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

78 HRM
58 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

115 HRR
105 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.54 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.34 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

166°C331 °F
178°C352 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.25%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.7%
0.9%

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) -60°C-76 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F
125 µm/m·K69.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
85°C185 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

150°C302 °F
130°C266 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

95°C203 °F
62°C144 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

152°C306 °F
158°C316 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

16%
15%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

140°C284 °F
130°C266 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.7 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.005 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
72 / 100

Weldability

12 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.9%
2%

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
1.5 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
215°C419 °F

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 90°C194 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
92 MJ/kg39,553 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
4.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
34 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.8 MN·m/kg
1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

392 kJ/m³
723 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePOM-C+PTFEPOM-H HI

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPOM-C+PTFEPOM-H HI
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

POM-C+PTFE vs POM-H HI — frequently asked

Is POM-C+PTFE stronger than POM-H HI?

Yes. POM-C+PTFE has a typical tensile strength of 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for POM-H HI — about 7% more.

Which is cheaper, POM-C+PTFE or POM-H HI?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, POM-C+PTFE or POM-H HI?

POM-C+PTFE. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (72/100) for POM-H HI; for welding the order is POM-H HI first (fair, 45/100) then POM-C+PTFE (not recommended, 12/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in POM-C+PTFE and POM-H HI side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.