FabDigitFabDigit

PETG vs RPET

Polymer · grade comparison

PETG and RPET are both polymer grades. RPET is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for PETG, about 10% more. In exchange, PETG is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 60% for RPET. PETG is lighter (1.27 g/cm³ vs 1.37 g/cm³ for RPET) and RPET is stiffer (2.6 GPa vs 2.1 GPa). On the shop floor, PETG welds better (80 vs 70 out of 100).

PETGChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

RPETChoose it when strength drives the design.

PETG vs RPET: properties

PETGRPET

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.1 GPa0.3 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.77 GPa0.11 Msi
0.95 GPa0.14 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

120%
60%

Compressive Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.1 GPa0.3 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in
35 J/m0.66 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
82 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

115 HRR
118 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Strength

—
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
4.5 MPa·√m4.1 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
96 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.27 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.37 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

80°C176 °F
78°C172 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.13%
0.2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.5%
0.55%

Refractive Index

1.57
1.575

Light Transmission

89%
86%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
250°C482 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

63°C145 °F
65°C149 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

70°C158 °F
72°C162 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

64°C147 °F
67°C153 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

82°C180 °F
80°C176 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

23%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

75°C167 °F
110°C230 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.8
3.2

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

88 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.35%
0.5%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

245°C473 °F
275°C527 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
30 g/10 min

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 25°C77 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb
35 MJ/kg15,047 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
1.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb
30 L/kg3.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
100%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

39 kN·m/kg
40 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.7 MN·m/kg
1.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

595 kJ/m³
520 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePETGRPET

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPETGRPET
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

PETG vs RPET — frequently asked

Is RPET stronger than PETG?

Yes. RPET has a typical tensile strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for PETG — about 10% more.

Which is cheaper, PETG or RPET?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PETG or RPET?

PETG, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for RPET; for welding the order is PETG first (very good, 80/100) then RPET (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PETG and RPET side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.