FabDigitFabDigit

PESU vs PSU-GF20

Polymer · grade comparison

PESU and PSU-GF20 are both polymer grades. PSU-GF20 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 85 MPa (12.3 ksi) for PESU, about 18% more. In exchange, PESU is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 3% for PSU-GF20. PSU-GF20 is stiffer (6.2 GPa vs 2.6 GPa) and PESU runs hotter in service (180°C vs 160°C continuous). On the shop floor, PESU machines more easily (65 vs 55 out of 100) and PESU welds better (very good vs fair).

PESUChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PSU-GF20Choose it when strength drives the design.

PESU vs PSU-GF20: properties

PESUPSU-GF20

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
6.2 GPa0.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.95 GPa0.14 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.58 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

85 MPa12.3 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

84 MPa12.2 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

45%
3%

Compressive Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
5.5 GPa0.8 Msi

Flexural Strength

129 MPa18.7 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.7 GPa0.38 Msi
5.9 GPa0.86 Msi

Shear Strength

66 MPa9.6 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

80 J/m1.5 ft·lbf/in
60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

87 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell M

88 HRM
90 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

120 HRR
122 HRR

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.39

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.37 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.38 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

225°C437 °F
187°C369 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.45%
0.22%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2.1%
0.6%

Refractive Index

1.65
—

Light Transmission

75%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.18 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.28 W/m·K0.16 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F
1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

55 µm/m·K30.6 µin/in·°F
25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
160°C320 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

216°C421 °F
186°C367 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

204°C399 °F
181°C358 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

223°C433 °F
190°C374 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

38%
32%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

220°C428 °F
190°C374 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.5
3.6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.005
0.006

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 17 kV/mm432 V/mil · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
86 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
35 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
0.3%

Melt Flow Rate

18 g/10 min
4 g/10 min

Mold Temperature (typ.)

160°C320 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 355°C671 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
135 MJ/kg58,040 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

8 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
72 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
4.5 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePESU

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPESUPSU-GF20
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PESU vs PSU-GF20 — frequently asked

Is PSU-GF20 stronger than PESU?

Yes. PSU-GF20 has a typical tensile strength of 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 85 MPa (12.3 ksi) for PESU — about 18% more.

Which is cheaper, PESU or PSU-GF20?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PESU or PSU-GF20?

PESU, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 55/100 for PSU-GF20; for welding the order is PESU first (very good, 70/100) then PSU-GF20 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PESU and PSU-GF20 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.