FabDigitFabDigit

PAS vs PSU-GF20

Polymer · grade comparison

PAS and PSU-GF20 are both polymer grades. PSU-GF20 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) for PAS, about 28% more. In exchange, PAS is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 3% for PSU-GF20. PAS is lighter (1.29 g/cm³ vs 1.38 g/cm³ for PSU-GF20) and PSU-GF20 is stiffer (6.2 GPa vs 2.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PAS welds better (very good vs fair).

PASChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PSU-GF20Choose it when strength drives the design.

PAS vs PSU-GF20: properties

PASPSU-GF20

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.5 GPa0.36 Msi
6.2 GPa0.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

78 MPa11.3 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

50%
3%

Compressive Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.5 GPa0.36 Msi
5.5 GPa0.8 Msi

Flexural Strength

108 MPa15.7 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
5.9 GPa0.86 Msi

Shear Strength

62 MPa9 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.6 MPa·√m2.4 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

85 J/m1.6 ft·lbf/in
60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

96 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell M

88 HRM
90 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

120 HRR
122 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.29 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.38 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

210°C410 °F
187°C369 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.4%
0.22%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.2%
0.6%

Refractive Index

1.64
—

Light Transmission

75%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.28 W/m·K0.16 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

55 µm/m·K30.6 µin/in·°F
25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

170°C338 °F
160°C320 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

195°C383 °F
186°C367 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

190°C374 °F
181°C358 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

210°C410 °F
190°C374 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

34%
32%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

210°C410 °F
190°C374 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.4
3.6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.008
0.006

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 17 kV/mm432 V/mil · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
86 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

72 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
35 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
0.3%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
4 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

360°C680 °F
355°C671 °F

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 150°C302 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb
135 MJ/kg58,040 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

8 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
72 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
4.5 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePAS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPASPSU-GF20
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PAS vs PSU-GF20 — frequently asked

Is PSU-GF20 stronger than PAS?

Yes. PSU-GF20 has a typical tensile strength of 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) for PAS — about 28% more.

Which is cheaper, PAS or PSU-GF20?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PAS or PSU-GF20?

PAS, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 62/100 against 55/100 for PSU-GF20; for welding the order is PAS first (very good, 72/100) then PSU-GF20 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PAS and PSU-GF20 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.