FabDigitFabDigit

PESU vs PESU-GF30

Polymer · grade comparison

PESU and PESU-GF30 are both polymer grades. PESU-GF30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 85 MPa (12.3 ksi) for PESU, about 76% more. In exchange, PESU is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 2.5% for PESU-GF30. PESU is lighter (1.37 g/cm³ vs 1.6 g/cm³ for PESU-GF30) and PESU-GF30 is stiffer (9.5 GPa vs 2.6 GPa). On the shop floor, PESU machines more easily (good vs fair) and PESU welds better (very good vs fair).

PESUChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PESU-GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PESU vs PESU-GF30: properties

PESUPESU-GF30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
9.5 GPa1.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.95 GPa0.14 Msi
3.4 GPa0.49 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.58 Msi
14 GPa2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

85 MPa12.3 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

84 MPa12.2 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

45%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
8.5 GPa1.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

129 MPa18.7 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.7 GPa0.38 Msi
9 GPa1.3 Msi

Shear Strength

66 MPa9.6 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

80 J/m1.5 ft·lbf/in
85 J/m1.6 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

87 Shore D
90 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

88 HRM
98 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

120 HRR
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.39

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.37 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.6 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

225°C437 °F
222°C432 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.45%
0.43%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2.1%
1.6%

Refractive Index

1.65
—

Light Transmission

75%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.18 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.32 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

55 µm/m·K30.6 µin/in·°F
22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

216°C421 °F
220°C428 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

204°C399 °F
216°C421 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

223°C433 °F
225°C437 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

38%
40%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

220°C428 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

17 kV/mm432 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.5
3.9

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.005
0.009

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
0.3%

Melt Flow Rate

18 g/10 min
20 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

355°C671 °F
360°C680 °F

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 160°C320 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

8 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
94 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
5.9 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePESU

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPESUPESU-GF30
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PESU vs PESU-GF30 — frequently asked

Is PESU-GF30 stronger than PESU?

Yes. PESU-GF30 has a typical tensile strength of 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 85 MPa (12.3 ksi) for PESU — about 76% more.

Which is cheaper, PESU or PESU-GF30?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PESU or PESU-GF30?

PESU. Its machinability rates good (65/100) against fair (45/100) for PESU-GF30; for welding the order is PESU first (very good, 70/100) then PESU-GF30 (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PESU and PESU-GF30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.