FabDigitFabDigit

PESU GF30 vs PESU GF40

Polymer · grade comparison

PESU-GF30 and PESU GF40 are both polymer grades, compared here in the GF40 condition. PESU GF40 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for PESU-GF30, about 10% more. In exchange, PESU-GF30 is the more ductile: elongation 2.5% versus 1.8% for PESU GF40. PESU-GF30 is lighter (1.6 g/cm³ vs 1.66 g/cm³ for PESU GF40) and PESU GF40 is stiffer (13 GPa vs 9.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PESU-GF30 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and PESU GF40 welds better (very good vs fair).

PESU-GF30Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PESU GF40Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

PESU-GF30 vs PESU GF40: properties

PESU-GF30PESU GF40

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

9.5 GPa1.4 Msi
13 GPa1.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

3.4 GPa0.49 Msi
0.95 GPa0.14 Msi

Bulk Modulus

14 GPa2 Msi
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

2.5%
1.8%

Compressive Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

8.5 GPa1.2 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Flexural Strength

210 MPa30.5 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

9 GPa1.3 Msi
12 GPa1.7 Msi

Shear Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
66 MPa9.6 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

85 J/m1.6 ft·lbf/in
95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

90 Shore D
87 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

98 HRM
88 HRM

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
84 MPa12.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
120 HRR

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.39

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.6 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.66 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

222°C432 °F
225°C437 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.43%
0.45%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.6%
2.1%

Refractive Index

—
1.65

Light Transmission

—
75%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.32 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.18 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
180°C356 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

220°C428 °F
216°C421 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

216°C421 °F
218°C424 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

225°C437 °F
223°C433 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

40%
38%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

250°C482 °F
220°C428 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
17 kV/mm432 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.9
3.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.005

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
34 / 100

Weldability

50 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
75 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
0.2%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
18 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

360°C680 °F
355°C671 °F

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 160°C320 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb
150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePESU

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPESU-GF30PESU GF40
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PESU-GF30 vs PESU GF40 — frequently asked

Is PESU GF40 stronger than PESU-GF30?

Yes. PESU GF40 has a typical tensile strength of 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for PESU-GF30 — about 10% more.

Which is cheaper, PESU-GF30 or PESU GF40?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PESU-GF30 or PESU GF40?

PESU-GF30. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (34/100) for PESU GF40; for welding the order is PESU GF40 first (very good, 70/100) then PESU-GF30 (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PESU-GF30 and PESU GF40 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.