FabDigitFabDigit

PES vs PPS

Polymer · grade comparison

PES and PPS are both polymer grades. PES is the stronger of the two: yield strength 84 MPa (12.2 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for PPS, about 12% more; tensile strength follows at 84 MPa (12.2 ksi) vs 78 MPa (11.3 ksi). PES is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 5% for PPS. PPS is stiffer (3.8 GPa vs 2.6 GPa) and PPS runs hotter in service (220°C vs 180°C continuous). On the shop floor, PES welds better (very good vs poor) and PES sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PPS (specialty, $$$$$).

PESChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PPSChoose it when the part sees heat.

PES vs PPS: properties

PESPPS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
3.8 GPa0.55 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.95 GPa0.14 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.62 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

84 MPa12.2 ksi
78 MPa11.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

84 MPa12.2 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

50%
5%

Compressive Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Flexural Strength

129 MPa18.7 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
3.9 GPa0.57 Msi

Shear Strength

62 MPa9 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.6 MPa·√m2.4 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

80 J/m1.5 ft·lbf/in
25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

86 Shore D
88 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

88 HRM
95 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

122 HRR
123 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.37 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.35 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

225°C437 °F
88°C190 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.43%
0.03%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2.1%
0.1%

Refractive Index

1.65
—

Light Transmission

72%
—

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
280°C536 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.18 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.29 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F
1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

55 µm/m·K30.6 µin/in·°F
52 µm/m·K28.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
220°C428 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

212°C414 °F
240°C464 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

203°C397 °F
110°C230 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

222°C432 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

38%
47%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

220°C428 °F
260°C500 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.5
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.0035
0.0013

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

150 V
175 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
1.2%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

360°C680 °F
320°C608 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

150°C302 °F
140°C284 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

8 kg CO₂/kg
6.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
2%

Same in both: Embodied Water 300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

61 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,357 kJ/m³
740 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePPSPES

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPESPPS
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

PES vs PPS — frequently asked

Is PES stronger than PPS?

Yes. PES has a typical yield strength of 84 MPa (12.2 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for PPS — about 12% more. Tensile strength is 84 MPa (12.2 ksi) vs 78 MPa (11.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PES or PPS?

PES is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PPS is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PES or PPS?

PES, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for PPS; for welding the order is PES first (very good, 70/100) then PPS (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PES and PPS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.