FabDigitFabDigit

PCTG vs PETG

Polymer · grade comparison

PCTG and PETG are both polymer grades. PETG is the stronger of the two: yield strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for PCTG, about 11% more; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi). In exchange, PCTG is the more ductile: elongation 330% versus 120% for PETG. PCTG is lighter (1.23 g/cm³ vs 1.27 g/cm³ for PETG) and PETG is stiffer (2.1 GPa vs 1.6 GPa). On the shop floor, PETG machines more easily (65 vs 55 out of 100) and PETG sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PCTG (standard, $$).

PCTGChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PETGChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

PCTG vs PETG: properties

PCTGPETG

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

330%
120%

Compressive Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Flexural Strength

62 MPa9 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

850 J/m15.9 ft·lbf/in
95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

76 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

108 HRR
115 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.77 GPa0.11 Msi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.23 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.27 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

88°C190 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.13%

Refractive Index

1.567
1.57

Light Transmission

90%
89%

Same in both: Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.5%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

65°C149 °F
63°C145 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

84°C183 °F
82°C180 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

85°C185 °F
75°C167 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa 70°C158 °F · Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa 64°C147 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 23%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
2.8

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 16 kV/mm406 V/mil · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
72 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
0.35%

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

250°C482 °F
245°C473 °F

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 25°C77 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

37 kN·m/kg
39 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.3 MN·m/kg
1.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

633 kJ/m³
595 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePETGPCTG

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPCTGPETG
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
UV Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

PCTG vs PETG — frequently asked

Is PETG stronger than PCTG?

Yes. PETG has a typical yield strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for PCTG — about 11% more. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PCTG or PETG?

PETG is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PCTG is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PCTG or PETG?

PETG, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 55/100 for PCTG; for welding the order is PCTG first (excellent, 85/100) then PETG (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PCTG and PETG side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.