FabDigitFabDigit

PCT vs PETG

Polymer · grade comparison

PCT and PETG are both polymer grades. PCT is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for PETG, about 10% more. In exchange, PETG is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 30% for PCT. PCT is lighter (1.23 g/cm³ vs 1.27 g/cm³ for PETG) and PCT runs hotter in service (130°C vs 63°C continuous). On the shop floor, PETG machines more easily (65 vs 55 out of 100), PETG welds better (very good vs good), and PETG sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PCT (high, $$$$).

PCTChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

PETGChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

PCT vs PETG: properties

PCTPETG

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
120%

Compressive Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Flexural Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

35 J/m0.66 ft·lbf/in
95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
115 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.77 GPa0.11 Msi

Hardness, Shore D

—
78 Shore D

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 2.1 GPa0.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.4

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.23 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.27 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

288°C550 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

90°C194 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.09%
0.13%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.35%
0.5%

Refractive Index

1.56
1.57

Light Transmission

—
89%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,250 J/kg·K0.3 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

130°C266 °F
63°C145 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

190°C374 °F
70°C158 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

90°C194 °F
64°C147 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

240°C464 °F
82°C180 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

260°C500 °F
75°C167 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 23%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
16 kV/mm406 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
2.8

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.015
0.02

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

250 V
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
72 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.6%
0.35%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

310°C590 °F
245°C473 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

120°C248 °F
25°C77 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

45 kN·m/kg
39 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

644 kJ/m³
595 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 1.7 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePETGPCT

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPCTPETG
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$$ High$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
UV Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

PCT vs PETG — frequently asked

Is PCT stronger than PETG?

Yes. PCT has a typical tensile strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for PETG — about 10% more.

Which is cheaper, PCT or PETG?

PETG is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PCT is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PCT or PETG?

PETG, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 55/100 for PCT; for welding the order is PETG first (very good, 80/100) then PCT (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PCT and PETG side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.