FabDigitFabDigit

PC/PBT vs PC-Si

Polymer · grade comparison

PC/PBT and PC-Si are both polymer grades. PC-Si is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) for PC/PBT, about 12% more; tensile strength follows at 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 53 MPa (7.69 ksi). PC-Si is harder — 80 Shore D against 76 Shore D for PC/PBT — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. PC-Si runs hotter in service (115°C vs 100°C continuous). On the shop floor, PC/PBT sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PC-Si (premium, $$$).

PC/PBTChoose it when cost is the deciding factor.

PC-SiChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

PC/PBT vs PC-Si: properties

PC/PBTPC-Si

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.2 GPa0.31 Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

53 MPa7.7 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Compressive Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
72 MPa10.4 ksi

Flexural Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
88 MPa12.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.1 GPa0.3 Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

750 J/m14 ft·lbf/in
850 J/m15.9 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

76 Shore D
80 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

115 HRR
118 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.8 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
3 GPa0.49 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Strength

—
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
68 HRM

Same in both: Elongation at Break 120%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.21 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

222°C432 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

130°C266 °F
143°C289 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.12%
0.15%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.4%
0.35%

Refractive Index

—
1.585

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.21 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
115°C239 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

125°C257 °F
132°C270 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

95°C203 °F
120°C248 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

135°C275 °F
142°C288 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

24%
32%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
145°C293 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

26 kV/mm660 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.1
2.9

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.012
0.01

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

275 V
250 V

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
75 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
80 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.75%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

15 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

260°C500 °F
290°C554 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

70°C158 °F
90°C194 °F

Formability (cold)

—
60 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
112 MJ/kg48,151 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
7.8 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

10%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

44 kN·m/kg
50 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

629 kJ/m³
765 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 1.8 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC/PBTPC-Si

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPC/PBTPC-Si
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PC/PBT vs PC-Si — frequently asked

Is PC-Si stronger than PC/PBT?

Yes. PC-Si has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) for PC/PBT — about 12% more. Tensile strength is 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 53 MPa (7.69 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PC/PBT or PC-Si?

PC/PBT is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PC-Si is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose PC/PBT over PC-Si?

Pick PC/PBT when cost is the deciding factor. Pick PC-Si when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PC/PBT and PC-Si side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.