FabDigitFabDigit

PC-MF vs PC-Optical

Polymer · grade comparison

PC-MF and PC-Optical are both polymer grades. PC-Optical is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 67 MPa (9.72 ksi) against 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) for PC-MF, about 8% more. PC-Optical is the more ductile: elongation 115% versus 10% for PC-MF. PC-Optical is lighter (1.2 g/cm³ vs 1.35 g/cm³ for PC-MF) and PC-MF is stiffer (3.8 GPa vs 2.4 GPa). On the shop floor, PC-Optical welds better (very good vs good) and PC-MF sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PC-Optical (premium, $$$).

PC-MFChoose it when cost is the deciding factor.

PC-OpticalChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PC-MF vs PC-Optical: properties

PC-MFPC-Optical

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.8 GPa0.55 Msi
2.4 GPa0.34 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
0.82 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

5 GPa0.73 Msi
3 GPa0.48 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

62 MPa9 ksi
67 MPa9.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
63 MPa9.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
115%

Compressive Strength

88 MPa12.8 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.2 GPa0.46 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Flexural Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
93 MPa13.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.7 GPa0.54 Msi
2.4 GPa0.34 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in
2.6 MPa·√m2.4 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in
700 J/m13.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
83 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

78 HRM
72 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.38 · Hardness, Rockwell R 120 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.35 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Refractive Index

—
1.586

Light Transmission

—
89%

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 147°C297 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.15% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.35%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.27 W/m·K0.16 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F
1,220 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

50 µm/m·K27.8 µin/in·°F
67 µm/m·K37.2 µin/in·°F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

142°C288 °F
138°C280 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

132°C270 °F
128°C262 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

27%
26%

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Vicat Softening Point (B50) 146°C295 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 140°C284 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.3
2.9

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.011
0.01

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 250 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
75 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

65 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
90 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.45%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
15 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

295°C563 °F
300°C572 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

90°C194 °F
110°C230 °F

Same in both: Machinability 62 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb
108 MJ/kg46,432 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
56 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.8 MN·m/kg
2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

474 kJ/m³
844 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC-OpticalPC-MF

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPC-MFPC-Optical
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PC-MF vs PC-Optical — frequently asked

Is PC-Optical stronger than PC-MF?

Yes. PC-Optical has a typical tensile strength of 67 MPa (9.72 ksi) against 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) for PC-MF — about 8% more.

Which is cheaper, PC-MF or PC-Optical?

PC-MF is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PC-Optical is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PC-MF or PC-Optical?

PC-Optical. Its weldability rates very good (75/100) against good (65/100) for PC-MF.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PC-MF and PC-Optical side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.