FabDigitFabDigit

PC-HT vs PC-MF

Polymer · grade comparison

PC-HT and PC-MF are both polymer grades. PC-HT is the stronger of the two: yield strength 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for PC-MF, about 13% more; tensile strength follows at 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) vs 62 MPa (8.99 ksi). PC-HT is the more ductile: elongation 90% versus 10% for PC-MF. PC-HT is lighter (1.2 g/cm³ vs 1.35 g/cm³ for PC-MF) and PC-MF is stiffer (3.8 GPa vs 2.4 GPa). On the shop floor, PC-MF sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PC-HT (high, $$$$).

PC-HTChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PC-MFChoose it when cost is the deciding factor.

PC-HT vs PC-MF: properties

PC-HTPC-MF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
3.8 GPa0.55 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.87 GPa0.13 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
5 GPa0.73 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

68 MPa9.9 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

90%
10%

Compressive Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
88 MPa12.8 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Flexural Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.5 GPa0.36 Msi
3.7 GPa0.54 Msi

Shear Strength

62 MPa9 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

620 J/m11.6 ft·lbf/in
110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

84 Shore D
85 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

76 HRM
78 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.38 · Hardness, Rockwell R 120 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.35 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

185°C365 °F
147°C297 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.15%

Refractive Index

1.59
—

Light Transmission

87%
—

Same in both: Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.35%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.27 W/m·K0.16 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F
1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

62 µm/m·K34.4 µin/in·°F
50 µm/m·K27.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

140°C284 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

172°C342 °F
142°C288 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

155°C311 °F
132°C270 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

178°C352 °F
146°C295 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

170°C338 °F
140°C284 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 27%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

28 kV/mm711 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.95
3.3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.01
0.011

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 250 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
68 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
0.45%

Melt Flow Rate

6 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

325°C617 °F
295°C563 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

115°C239 °F
90°C194 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

112 MJ/kg48,151 BTU/lb
90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

58 kN·m/kg
46 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

963 kJ/m³
474 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC-HTPC-MF

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPC-HTPC-MF
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PC-HT vs PC-MF — frequently asked

Is PC-HT stronger than PC-MF?

Yes. PC-HT has a typical yield strength of 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for PC-MF — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) vs 62 MPa (8.99 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PC-HT or PC-MF?

PC-MF is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PC-HT is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PC-HT or PC-MF?

PC-HT. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (65/100) for PC-MF.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PC-HT and PC-MF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.