FabDigitFabDigit

PC-FR vs PC-GF

Polymer · grade comparison

PC-FR and PC-GF are both polymer grades. PC-GF is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 64 MPa (9.28 ksi) for PC-FR, about 103% more. In exchange, PC-FR is the more ductile: elongation 100% versus 2.5% for PC-GF. PC-FR is lighter (1.22 g/cm³ vs 1.43 g/cm³ for PC-GF) and PC-GF is stiffer (8.5 GPa vs 2.4 GPa). On the shop floor, PC-GF sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PC-FR (premium, $$$).

PC-FRChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PC-GFChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PC-FR vs PC-GF: properties

PC-FRPC-GF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.4 GPa0.34 Msi
8.5 GPa1.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
3.1 GPa0.45 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.55 Msi
10 GPa1.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.39
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

64 MPa9.3 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

62 MPa9 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

100%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
7 GPa1 Msi

Flexural Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
8 GPa1.2 Msi

Shear Strength

62 MPa9 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.6 MPa·√m2.4 ksi·√in
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

650 J/m12.2 ft·lbf/in
110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

81 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell M

72 HRM
93 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

120 HRR
119 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.22 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.43 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.15%
0.12%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.35%
0.3%

Refractive Index

1.586
—

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 147°C297 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.24 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F
1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

67 µm/m·K37.2 µin/in·°F
22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
130°C266 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

140°C284 °F
152°C306 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

128°C262 °F
146°C295 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

145°C293 °F
152°C306 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

34%
27%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

140°C284 °F
160°C320 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
28 kV/mm711 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.95
3.4

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.01
0.009

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

250 V
175 V

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
0.35%

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
6 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

285°C545 °F
300°C572 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

90°C194 °F
100°C212 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.6 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

52 kN·m/kg
91 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
5.9 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC-FR

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPC-FRPC-GF
3D printingYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

PC-FR vs PC-GF — frequently asked

Is PC-GF stronger than PC-FR?

Yes. PC-GF has a typical tensile strength of 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 64 MPa (9.28 ksi) for PC-FR — about 103% more.

Which is cheaper, PC-FR or PC-GF?

PC-GF is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PC-FR is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PC-FR or PC-GF?

PC-FR, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for PC-GF; for welding the order is PC-FR first (good, 60/100) then PC-GF (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PC-FR and PC-GF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.