FabDigitFabDigit

PC/ASA vs PC/PBT

Polymer · grade comparison

PC/ASA and PC/PBT are both polymer grades. Both yield at about 54 MPa — strength does not separate them. PC/PBT is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 80% for PC/ASA, and PC/ASA is harder (80 Shore D vs 76 Shore D). PC/ASA is lighter (1.15 g/cm³ vs 1.21 g/cm³ for PC/PBT) and PC/ASA is stiffer (2.3 GPa vs 2.2 GPa). On the shop floor, PC/PBT welds better (very good vs good) and PC/PBT sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PC/ASA (premium, $$$).

PC/ASAChoose it when weight is the constraint.

PC/PBTChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

PC/ASA vs PC/PBT: properties

PC/ASAPC/PBT

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2.2 GPa0.31 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
53 MPa7.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

54 MPa7.8 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

80%
120%

Compressive Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Flexural Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

500 J/m9.4 ft·lbf/in
750 J/m14 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

80 Shore D
76 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

72 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

112 HRR
115 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.21 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

120°C248 °F
130°C266 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.12%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.6%
0.4%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
222°C432 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.21 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
100°C212 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

115°C239 °F
125°C257 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

100°C212 °F
95°C203 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

128°C262 °F
135°C275 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

120°C248 °F
130°C266 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 24%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

28 kV/mm711 V/mil
26 kV/mm660 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.012

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

250 V
275 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

88 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
—

Polishability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.75%

Same in both: Melt Flow Rate 15 g/10 min · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 260°C500 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 70°C158 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
10%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

48 kN·m/kg
44 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
1.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

634 kJ/m³
629 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC/PBTPC/ASA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPC/ASAPC/PBT
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PC/ASA vs PC/PBT — frequently asked

What is the difference between PC/ASA and PC/PBT?

PC/ASA and PC/PBT are both polymer grades. Both yield at about 54 MPa — strength does not separate them. PC/PBT is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 80% for PC/ASA, and PC/ASA is harder (80 Shore D vs 76 Shore D).

Which is cheaper, PC/ASA or PC/PBT?

PC/PBT is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PC/ASA is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PC/ASA or PC/PBT?

PC/PBT. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for PC/ASA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PC/ASA and PC/PBT side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.