FabDigitFabDigit

PC/ASA vs PC-Medical

Polymer · grade comparison

PC/ASA and PC-Medical are both polymer grades. PC-Medical is the stronger of the two: yield strength 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) against 54 MPa (7.83 ksi) for PC/ASA, about 15% more; tensile strength follows at 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi). PC-Medical is the more ductile: elongation 115% versus 80% for PC/ASA. PC/ASA is lighter (1.15 g/cm³ vs 1.2 g/cm³ for PC-Medical) and PC-Medical runs hotter in service (115°C vs 95°C continuous). On the shop floor, PC-Medical welds better (very good vs good).

PC/ASAChoose it when weight is the constraint.

PC-MedicalChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PC/ASA vs PC-Medical: properties

PC/ASAPC-Medical

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2.4 GPa0.34 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

54 MPa7.8 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Elongation at Break

80%
115%

Compressive Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Flexural Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2.4 GPa0.34 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
2.7 MPa·√m2.5 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

500 J/m9.4 ft·lbf/in
800 J/m15 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

80 Shore D
82 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

112 HRR
120 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.85 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
3 GPa0.49 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Same in both: Shear Strength 40 MPa5.8 ksi · Hardness, Rockwell M 72 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

120°C248 °F
147°C297 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.15%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.6%
0.35%

Refractive Index

—
1.586

Light Transmission

—
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
115°C239 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

115°C239 °F
138°C280 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

100°C212 °F
128°C262 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

128°C262 °F
146°C295 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

24%
26%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

120°C248 °F
145°C293 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

28 kV/mm711 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
2.9

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.01

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 250 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

88 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

55 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
90 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

15 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

260°C500 °F
300°C572 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

70°C158 °F
95°C203 °F

Same in both: Machinability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

48 kN·m/kg
57 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

634 kJ/m³
818 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 2 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC/ASAPC-Medical

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPC/ASAPC-Medical
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PC/ASA vs PC-Medical — frequently asked

Is PC-Medical stronger than PC/ASA?

Yes. PC-Medical has a typical yield strength of 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) against 54 MPa (7.83 ksi) for PC/ASA — about 15% more. Tensile strength is 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PC/ASA or PC-Medical?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, PC/ASA or PC-Medical?

PC-Medical. Its weldability rates very good (75/100) against good (55/100) for PC/ASA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PC/ASA and PC-Medical side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.