FabDigitFabDigit

PC/ASA vs PC-FR

Polymer · grade comparison

PC/ASA and PC-FR are both polymer grades. PC-FR is the stronger of the two: yield strength 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) against 54 MPa (7.83 ksi) for PC/ASA, about 15% more; tensile strength follows at 64 MPa (9.28 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi). PC-FR is the more ductile: elongation 100% versus 80% for PC/ASA. PC/ASA is lighter (1.15 g/cm³ vs 1.22 g/cm³ for PC-FR) and PC-FR runs hotter in service (120°C vs 95°C continuous).

PC/ASAChoose it when weight is the constraint.

PC-FRChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PC/ASA vs PC-FR: properties

PC/ASAPC-FR

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2.4 GPa0.34 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
64 MPa9.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

54 MPa7.8 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Elongation at Break

80%
100%

Compressive Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Flexural Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
2.6 MPa·√m2.4 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

500 J/m9.4 ft·lbf/in
650 J/m12.2 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

80 Shore D
81 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

112 HRR
120 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.85 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.55 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Same in both: Flexural Modulus 2.3 GPa0.33 Msi · Hardness, Rockwell M 72 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.22 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

120°C248 °F
147°C297 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.15%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.6%
0.35%

Refractive Index

—
1.586

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
67 µm/m·K37.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

115°C239 °F
140°C284 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

100°C212 °F
128°C262 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

128°C262 °F
145°C293 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

24%
34%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

120°C248 °F
140°C284 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

28 kV/mm711 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
2.95

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.01

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 250 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
60 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

88 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

15 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

260°C500 °F
285°C545 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

70°C158 °F
90°C194 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

48 kN·m/kg
52 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
1.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

634 kJ/m³
818 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC-FRPC/ASA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPC/ASAPC-FR
3D printing—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
UV Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

PC/ASA vs PC-FR — frequently asked

Is PC-FR stronger than PC/ASA?

Yes. PC-FR has a typical yield strength of 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) against 54 MPa (7.83 ksi) for PC/ASA — about 15% more. Tensile strength is 64 MPa (9.28 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PC/ASA or PC-FR?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PC/ASA or PC-FR?

PC-FR, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for PC/ASA; for welding the order is PC-FR first (good, 60/100) then PC/ASA (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PC/ASA and PC-FR side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.