FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs PETG-CF

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and PETG-CF are both polymer grades, both multipurpose plastic. PETG-CF is the stronger of the two: yield strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS, about 19% more; tensile strength follows at 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi). In exchange, ABS is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 4.5% for PETG-CF. ABS is lighter (1.04 g/cm³ vs 1.32 g/cm³ for PETG-CF) and PETG-CF is stiffer (4.2 GPa vs 2.3 GPa). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs good), ABS welds better (very good vs fair), and ABS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PETG-CF (standard, $$).

ABSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PETG-CFChoose it when strength drives the design.

ABS vs PETG-CF: properties

ABSPETG-CF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
4.2 GPa0.61 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
4.5%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
82 MPa11.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
80 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
112 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.32 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
79°C174 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.14%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
0.5%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,250 J/kg·K0.3 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
40 µm/m·K22.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
68°C154 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
76°C169 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
70°C158 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
82°C180 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
85°C185 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
—

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
—

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹² Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹³ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
50 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.3%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
12 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
250°C482 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
78°C172 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
39 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
3.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
298 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSPETG-CF

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSPETG-CF
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Spray PaintingYes—

Both are offered for 3D printing. They share 10 finishes: Conductive Coating, Dyeing (Nylon), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Primer Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Tinted Coating, UV Coating, Vacuum Metallization, Waterproof Coating.

ABS vs PETG-CF — frequently asked

Is PETG-CF stronger than ABS?

Yes. PETG-CF has a typical yield strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS — about 19% more. Tensile strength is 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS or PETG-CF?

ABS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PETG-CF is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or PETG-CF?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (62/100) for PETG-CF; for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then PETG-CF (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and PETG-CF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.