FabDigitFabDigit

MXD6 vs PPA

Polymer · grade comparison

MXD6 and PPA are both polymer grades. MXD6 is the more ductile: elongation 2.5% versus 2.2% for PPA. PPA is stiffer (11 GPa vs 10 GPa) and PPA runs hotter in service (170°C vs 120°C continuous). On the shop floor, PPA machines more easily (50 vs 40 out of 100), MXD6 welds better (good vs fair), and MXD6 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PPA (specialty, $$$$$).

MXD6Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

PPAChoose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

MXD6 vs PPA: properties

MXD6PPA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

10 GPa1.5 Msi
11 GPa1.6 Msi

Elongation at Break

2.5%
2.2%

Compressive Strength

170 MPa24.7 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Flexural Strength

285 MPa41.3 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

9.5 GPa1.4 Msi
9.8 GPa1.4 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
100 J/m1.9 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

100 HRM
95 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.35 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 200 MPa29 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.48 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.45 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

240°C464 °F
315°C599 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

88°C190 °F
123°C253 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.25%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2.4%
1.3%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.32 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
170°C338 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

230°C446 °F
300°C572 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

215°C419 °F
285°C545 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

24%
26%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

200°C392 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
28 kV/mm711 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.017

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

550 V
600 V

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 4

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
82 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
10 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
0.35%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

270°C518 °F
330°C626 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

130°C266 °F
150°C302 °F

Polishability

—
30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb
140 MJ/kg60,189 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

135 kN·m/kg
138 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

6.8 MN·m/kg
7.6 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePPAMXD6

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMXD6PPA
Default conditionGF30GF30
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Injection molding. Both take the same 5 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

MXD6 vs PPA — frequently asked

What is the difference between MXD6 and PPA?

MXD6 and PPA are both polymer grades. MXD6 is the more ductile: elongation 2.5% versus 2.2% for PPA. PPA is stiffer (11 GPa vs 10 GPa) and PPA runs hotter in service (170°C vs 120°C continuous).

Which is cheaper, MXD6 or PPA?

MXD6 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PPA is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, MXD6 or PPA?

PPA, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 40/100 for MXD6; for welding the order is MXD6 first (good, 55/100) then PPA (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in MXD6 and PPA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.