GB/T 10801.1 Type II vs XPS 300
Polymer · grade comparison
GB/T 10801.1 Type II and XPS 300 are both polymer grades. XPS 300 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 0.45 MPa (0.0653 ksi) against 0.25 MPa (0.0363 ksi) for GB/T 10801.1 Type II, about 80% more. In exchange, GB/T 10801.1 Type II is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 3% for XPS 300. GB/T 10801.1 Type II is lighter (0.02 g/cm³ vs 0.04 g/cm³ for XPS 300) and XPS 300 is stiffer (0.02 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, GB/T 10801.1 Type II welds better (25 vs 15 out of 100).
GB/T 10801.1 Type IIChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.
XPS 300Choose it when strength drives the design.
GB/T 10801.1 Type II vs XPS 300: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all polymer grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all polymer grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Compressive Modulus
Flexural Strength
Shear Strength
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Flexural Modulus
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Water Absorption (Saturation)
Water Absorption (24 h)
Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 100°C212 °F
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Vicat Softening Point (B50)
Limiting Oxygen Index
Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 75°C167 °F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 85°C185 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)
Volume Resistivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
UV / Weathering Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Mold Shrinkage
Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Thermal Diffusivity
Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | GB/T 10801.1 Type II | XPS 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$ Standard | $$ Standard |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
GB/T 10801.1 Type II vs XPS 300 — frequently asked
Is XPS 300 stronger than GB/T 10801.1 Type II?
Yes. XPS 300 has a typical tensile strength of 0.45 MPa (0.0653 ksi) against 0.25 MPa (0.0363 ksi) for GB/T 10801.1 Type II — about 80% more.
Which is cheaper, GB/T 10801.1 Type II or XPS 300?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which welds better, GB/T 10801.1 Type II or XPS 300?
GB/T 10801.1 Type II. Its weldability rates poor (25/100) against poor (15/100) for XPS 300.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in GB/T 10801.1 Type II and XPS 300 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.