C578 Type IV vs XPS 300
Polymer · grade comparison
C578 Type IV and XPS 300 are both polymer grades. XPS 300 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 0.45 MPa (0.0653 ksi) against 0.4 MPa (0.058 ksi) for C578 Type IV, about 12% more. C578 Type IV is lighter (0.03 g/cm³ vs 0.04 g/cm³ for XPS 300) and XPS 300 is stiffer (0.02 GPa vs 0.01 GPa). On the shop floor, C578 Type IV forms better (poor vs not recommended).
C578 Type IVChoose it when weight is the constraint.
XPS 300Choose it when strength drives the design.
C578 Type IV vs XPS 300: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all polymer grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all polymer grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Compressive Strength
Compressive Modulus
Flexural Strength
Shear Strength
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Flexural Modulus
Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Water Absorption (24 h)
Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 100°C212 °F · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.5%
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Vicat Softening Point (B50)
Max Service Temperature (short-term)
Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 25%
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)
Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)
Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 85 / 100 · UV / Weathering Resistance 15 / 100
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Polishability
Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 15%
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0.4 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.7 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C578 Type IV | XPS 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$ Standard | $$ Standard |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
C578 Type IV vs XPS 300 — frequently asked
Is XPS 300 stronger than C578 Type IV?
Yes. XPS 300 has a typical tensile strength of 0.45 MPa (0.0653 ksi) against 0.4 MPa (0.058 ksi) for C578 Type IV — about 12% more.
Which is cheaper, C578 Type IV or XPS 300?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which welds better, C578 Type IV or XPS 300?
C578 Type IV. Its weldability rates poor (20/100) against poor (15/100) for XPS 300.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C578 Type IV and XPS 300 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.