FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs SBS

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and SBS are both polymer grades. ABS is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for SBS, about 43% more. In exchange, SBS is the more ductile: elongation 880% versus 25% for ABS, and ABS is harder (78 Shore D vs 22 Shore D). SBS is lighter (0.94 g/cm³ vs 1.04 g/cm³ for ABS) and ABS is stiffer (2.3 GPa vs 0.02 GPa). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs poor), ABS welds better (very good vs good), and ABS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than SBS (standard, $$).

ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

SBSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

ABS vs SBS: properties

ABSSBS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
0.02 GPa0 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.49

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

25%
880%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
—

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
22 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
71 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
45 kN/m257 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
40%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
-90°C-130 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.06%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
—

Refractive Index

—
1.54

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
65°C149 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
85°C185 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
2.4

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
8×10⁻⁴

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
20 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
20 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
1.6%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
0.5 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
185°C365 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
102 MJ/kg43,852 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.8 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
32 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
2

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSSBS
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ABS vs SBS — frequently asked

Is ABS stronger than SBS?

Yes. ABS has a typical tensile strength of 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for SBS — about 43% more.

Which is cheaper, ABS or SBS?

ABS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while SBS is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or SBS?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against poor (20/100) for SBS; for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then SBS (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and SBS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.