FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs PPE/PPO

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and PPE/PPO are both polymer grades. PPE/PPO is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi). PPE/PPO is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 25% for ABS. PPE/PPO is stiffer (2.5 GPa vs 2.3 GPa) and PPE/PPO runs hotter in service (100°C vs 75°C continuous). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs good) and ABS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PPE/PPO (premium, $$$).

ABSChoose it when the part is machined in volume, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PPE/PPOChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ABS vs PPE/PPO: properties

ABSPPE/PPO

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
0.9 GPa0.13 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
50%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
220 J/m4.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
80 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
119 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.06 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
150°C302 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.07%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
0.2%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
135°C275 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
112°C234 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
140°C284 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
24%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
130°C266 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
2.6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.001

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
400 V

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
280°C536 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
57 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
2.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
673 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSPPE/PPO

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSPPE/PPO
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ABS vs PPE/PPO — frequently asked

Is PPE/PPO stronger than ABS?

Yes. PPE/PPO has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS or PPE/PPO?

ABS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PPE/PPO is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or PPE/PPO?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (65/100) for PPE/PPO; for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then PPE/PPO (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and PPE/PPO side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.