FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs PLA-CF

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and PLA-CF are both polymer grades, both multipurpose plastic. PLA-CF is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) against 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) for ABS, about 21% more. In exchange, ABS is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 2% for PLA-CF. ABS is lighter (1.04 g/cm³ vs 1.28 g/cm³ for PLA-CF) and PLA-CF is stiffer (6 GPa vs 2.3 GPa). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs good), ABS welds better (very good vs poor), and ABS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PLA-CF (standard, $$).

ABSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PLA-CFChoose it when strength drives the design.

ABS vs PLA-CF: properties

ABSPLA-CF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
6 GPa0.87 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

25%
2%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
6 GPa0.87 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
80 Shore D

Same in both: Hardness, Rockwell R 105 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.28 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
58°C136 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.4%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
155°C311 °F

Same in both: Water Absorption (Saturation) 1%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
45 µm/m·K25 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
55°C131 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
58°C136 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
53°C127 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
60°C140 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
20%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
70°C158 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10⁷ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁴ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
—

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10⁹ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10⁸ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
20 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.3%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
215°C419 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
55°C131 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
4.7 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 41 kN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSPLA-CF

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSPLA-CF
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Spray PaintingYes—

Both are offered for 3D printing. They share 10 finishes: Conductive Coating, Dyeing (Nylon), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Primer Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Tinted Coating, UV Coating, Vacuum Metallization, Waterproof Coating.

ABS vs PLA-CF — frequently asked

Is PLA-CF stronger than ABS?

Yes. PLA-CF has a typical tensile strength of 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) against 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) for ABS — about 21% more.

Which is cheaper, ABS or PLA-CF?

ABS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PLA-CF is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or PLA-CF?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (60/100) for PLA-CF; for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then PLA-CF (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and PLA-CF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.