Nickel Alloy Inconel 600 vs Nimonic 86
Nickel Alloy · grade comparison
Nickel Alloy Inconel 600 and Nimonic 86 are both nickel alloy grades. Nimonic 86 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) against 255 MPa (37 ksi) for Inconel 600, about 49% more; tensile strength follows at 800 MPa (116 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi). Nimonic 86 is the more ductile: elongation 48% versus 42% for Inconel 600, and Nimonic 86 is harder (195 HB vs 150 HB). Inconel 600 conducts heat better (14.9 W/m·K vs 10 W/m·K).
Nimonic 86Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
Inconel 600 vs Nimonic 86: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all nickel alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all nickel alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Min Service Temperature
Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 1,100°C2,012 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 65 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Same in both: Embodied Water 320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 40%
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | Inconel 600 | Nimonic 86 |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.
Inconel 600 vs Nimonic 86 — frequently asked
Is Nimonic 86 stronger than Inconel 600?
Yes. Nimonic 86 has a typical yield strength of 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) against 255 MPa (37 ksi) for Inconel 600 — about 49% more. Tensile strength is 800 MPa (116 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).
Which is cheaper, Inconel 600 or Nimonic 86?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, Inconel 600 or Nimonic 86?
Inconel 600, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 28/100 against 22/100 for Nimonic 86; for welding the order is Inconel 600 first (very good, 80/100) then Nimonic 86 (very good, 75/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Inconel 600 and Nimonic 86 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.