FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy ENiCrCoMo-1 vs ERNiMo-3

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy ENiCrCoMo-1 and ERNiMo-3 are both nickel alloy grades. ERNiMo-3 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 720 MPa (104 ksi) for ENiCrCoMo-1, about 6% more. ENiCrCoMo-1 is lighter (8.36 g/cm³ vs 9.22 g/cm³ for ERNiMo-3) and ENiCrCoMo-1 runs hotter in service (1,100°C vs 550°C continuous). On the shop floor, ERNiMo-3 forms better (good vs fair).

ENiCrCoMo-1Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

ERNiMo-3Choose it when strength drives the design.

ENiCrCoMo-1 vs ERNiMo-3: properties

ENiCrCoMo-1ERNiMo-3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

211 GPa30.6 Msi
217 GPa31.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
83 GPa12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

176 GPa25.5 Msi
190 GPa27.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.31

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

720 MPa104 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

430 MPa62.4 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

38%
40%

Reduction in Area

40%
45%

Compressive Strength

440 MPa63.8 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in
110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

75 J55.3 ft·lbf
120 J88.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

94 HRB
92 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

17 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

220 HV
—

Same in both: Shear Strength 480 MPa69.6 ksi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 300 MPa43.5 ksi · Hardness, Brinell 210 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.36 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
9.22 g/cm³0.33 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,332°C2,430 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,380°C2,516 °F
1,418°C2,584 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

13.6 W/m·K7.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10 W/m·K5.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
373 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.6 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
10.7 µm/m·K5.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,100°C2,012 °F
550°C1,022 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 290 J/g125 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.4 % IACS
1.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.22×10⁻⁶ Ω·m48 µΩ·in
1.37×10⁻⁶ Ω·m53.9 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.2 V

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
15 / 100

Weldability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 12% · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 175 MJ/kg75,237 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

86 kN·m/kg
82 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.2 MN·m/kg
23.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

438 kJ/m³
446 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.9 mm²/s
2.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleENiCrCoMo-1ERNiMo-3

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityENiCrCoMo-1ERNiMo-3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

ENiCrCoMo-1 vs ERNiMo-3 — frequently asked

Is ERNiMo-3 stronger than ENiCrCoMo-1?

Yes. ERNiMo-3 has a typical tensile strength of 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 720 MPa (104 ksi) for ENiCrCoMo-1 — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, ENiCrCoMo-1 or ERNiMo-3?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, ENiCrCoMo-1 or ERNiMo-3?

ENiCrCoMo-1, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 20/100 against 15/100 for ERNiMo-3; for welding the order is ENiCrCoMo-1 first (excellent, 85/100) then ERNiMo-3 (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ENiCrCoMo-1 and ERNiMo-3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.