Nickel Alloy ENiCrCoMo-1 vs ERNiFeCr-2
Nickel Alloy · grade comparison
Nickel Alloy ENiCrCoMo-1 and ERNiFeCr-2 are both nickel alloy grades. ERNiFeCr-2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) for ENiCrCoMo-1, about 28% more; tensile strength follows at 830 MPa (120 ksi) vs 720 MPa (104 ksi). In exchange, ENiCrCoMo-1 is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 25% for ERNiFeCr-2, and ERNiFeCr-2 is harder (240 HB vs 210 HB). ENiCrCoMo-1 is stiffer (211 GPa vs 200 GPa) and ENiCrCoMo-1 runs hotter in service (1,100°C vs 600°C continuous). On the shop floor, ERNiFeCr-2 machines more easily (30 vs 20 out of 100) and ENiCrCoMo-1 welds better (excellent vs good).
ENiCrCoMo-1Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.
ERNiFeCr-2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.
ENiCrCoMo-1 vs ERNiFeCr-2: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all nickel alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all nickel alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Rockwell C
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Reduction in Area 40% · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 300 MPa43.5 ksi
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.15 V
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Polishability
Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 4
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | ENiCrCoMo-1 | ERNiFeCr-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.
ENiCrCoMo-1 vs ERNiFeCr-2 — frequently asked
Is ERNiFeCr-2 stronger than ENiCrCoMo-1?
Yes. ERNiFeCr-2 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) for ENiCrCoMo-1 — about 28% more. Tensile strength is 830 MPa (120 ksi) vs 720 MPa (104 ksi).
Which is cheaper, ENiCrCoMo-1 or ERNiFeCr-2?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, ENiCrCoMo-1 or ERNiFeCr-2?
ERNiFeCr-2, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 20/100 for ENiCrCoMo-1; for welding the order is ENiCrCoMo-1 first (excellent, 85/100) then ERNiFeCr-2 (good, 60/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ENiCrCoMo-1 and ERNiFeCr-2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.